Journal of Endodontics
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 177-181, April 1996

Comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium instruments in molar root canal preparation*

  • Jeffrey A. Samyn, DDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Samyn is a former graduate student (currently practicing in Seattle, WA) Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • Jack I. Nicholls, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Steiner is a senior lecturer, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • James C. Steiner, DDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Nicholls is professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr. James C. Steiner, Department of Endodontics, SM-48, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Forty mesial canals in extracted human molar teeth were embedded and sectioned at two root levels. Reassembled teeth were instrumented using a step-back technique with stainless steel (SS) or nickel-titanium (NT) K-type files. Superimposed pre- and postinstrumented cross-sectional root images were projected, traced, and scanned into a computer for analysis. The amount and direction of canal center movement, canal area change, and final canal shape were recorded. The results showed no significant difference in canal center movement or canal area change between the SS and NT groups. All canal centers deviated toward the furcation region at the height of curvature and in the opposite direction in apical sections. The degree of canal curvature had no correlation to canal center movement or canal area change. Fifty-three percent of SS and 68% of NT instrument preparations were classified as oval.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

* This study was partially supported by the Graduate Endodontic Fund, University of Washington, School of Dentistry, Seattle, WA.

PII: S0099-2399(96)80096-3

doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80096-3

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 177-181, April 1996