Journal of Endodontics
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 125-126, February 2002

Measurement of the Distance Between the Minor Foramen and the Anatomic Apex by Digital and Conventional Radiography

  • Bernice Melius
  • ,
  • Jin Jiang, DDS
  • ,
  • Qiang Zhu, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr. Qiang Zhu, Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-1715.

Ms. Melius is a third-year dental student at Meharry Medical College School of Dentistry, Nashville, Tennessee. Dr. Jiang is an endodontic postgraduate student, and Dr. Zhu is assistant professor, Department of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut.

The purpose of this study was to determine the distance between the minor foreman and the anatomic apex from digital and conventional radiographs. Thirty permanent single-canal teeth with mature root apex were used. After access preparation, a K-file was inserted into the canal until the tip of the file was just seen at the minor foramen under a ×40 stereomicroscope. The file was fixed in the canal by filling the access with composite resin. The teeth with files in the canals were radiographed using a Schick CDR digital system and conventional radiography with E-speed film. For digital radiographs, the distance between the file tip and the center of radiographic apex was directly measured from the computer screen by using Schick CDR measurement software. For conventional radiographs, the distance was measured under a stereomicroscope at a magnification of ×10 with a calibrated millimeter ruler. The mean distance was 0.494 mm measured from conventional radiographs and 0.594 mm from digital radiographs. These results agree with the current conception that endodontic working length should terminate 1 mm from the radiographic apex. There was a significant difference between the measurements on digital radiographs and those on conventional radiographs (p < 0.05, paired t test). However, the 0.1-mm difference has no clinical significance, because clinically, the working length is generally measured to the nearest 0.5 mm.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(05)60598-5

doi:10.1097/00004770-200202000-00019

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 125-126, February 2002