Journal of Endodontics
Volume 18, Issue 7 , Pages 332-335, July 1992

Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?*

  • Christine M. Sedgley, BDS, MDSc, FRACDS

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Sedgley is a graduate student in endodortics, School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • ,
  • Harold H. Messer, MDSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Messer is professor of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne.

This study compared biomechanical properties (punch shear strength, toughness, hardness, and load to fracture) of 23 endodontically treated teeth (mean time since endodontic treatment: 10.1 yr) and their contralateral vital pairs. Analyses using paired t tests revealed no significant differences in punch shear strength, toughness, and load to fracture between the two groups. Vital dentin was 3.5% harder than dentin from contralateral endodontically treated teeth (p = 0.002). The similarity between the biomechanical properties of endodontically treated teeth and their contralateral vital pairs indicates that teeth do not become more brittle following endodontic treatment. Other factors may be more critical to failure of endodontically treated teeth.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

* This project was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and was based on a thesis submitted to the University of Melbourne in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MDSc degree.

PII: S0099-2399(06)80483-8

doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80483-8

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 18, Issue 7 , Pages 332-335, July 1992