Journal of Endodontics
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 782-787, July 2007

The In Vivo Evaluation of Hand/Rotary/Ultrasound Instrumentation in Necrotic, Human Mandibular Molars

Department of Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Abstract 

This in vivo, prospective, randomized, single-blinded study histologically compared biofilm/necrotic debridement efficiency of a hand/rotary technique versus a hand/rotary/1 min ultrasound technique in the mesial roots of necrotic, human mandibular molars. The hand/rotary group consisted of 20 mesial roots. The hand/rotary/ultrasound group consisted of 20 mesial roots prepared with the same hand/rotary technique followed by 1 min of ultrasonic irrigation, per canal, utilizing an ultrasonic needle in a MiniEndo unit. Following extraction, histologic preparation and staining, 0.2 μm cross-sections from the 1- to 3-mm apical levels were evaluated for percentage of biofilm/necrotic debris removal. Cleanliness results at the 1-, 2- and 3-mm levels for the hand/rotary and hand/rotary/ultrasound techniques, respectively, were: Canals, 80% versus 95%, 92% versus 99%, and 95% versus 100%; Isthmuses, 33% versus 83%, 31% versus 86%, 45% versus 91%. Statistical analysis revealed mean percent canal and isthmus cleanliness values to be significantly higher for hand/rotary/ultrasound technique at all levels evaluated.

Key Words: Biofilm, necrotic debris, ultrasonic irrigation, ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by research funding from the Graduate Student Research Fund, Section of Endodontics, The Ohio State University.

PII: S0099-2399(07)00390-1

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.04.015

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 782-787, July 2007