Journal of Endodontics
Volume 33, Issue 11 , Pages 1338-1341, November 2007

Comparison of the Area of Resin-based Sealer and Voids in Roots Obturated with Resilon and Gutta-Percha

  • Kamran Gulsahi, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Kamran Gulsahi, DDS, PhD, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, 11. sokak, No. 26, 06490 Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkey.
  • ,
  • Zafer C. Cehreli, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Emel O. Onay, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Fugen Tasman-Dagli, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • ,
  • Mete Ungor, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey

published online 10 August 2007.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to compare the cross-sectional area of sealer plus voids of Epiphany sealer surrounding root fillings completed with Resilon cones and laterally compacted gutta-percha. The root canals of extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared to a final size of 40 (0.06 taper). The teeth were then randomly assigned into 2 groups (n = 12/group) for the filling procedures in conjunction with Epiphany sealer: group 1, Resilon cones, and group 2, gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were obtained every 1 mm up to 5 mm from the apical foramen. The sections were digitally photographed under magnification, and the cross-sectional area of the root canal and the area occupied by the sealer and voids were calculated, after which statistical comparisons were made. No differences were found between the sealer plus void or void area of Resilon or gutta-percha groups at any level of sectioning (P > .05). Comparisons within each obturation group showed that there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning with regard to the ratio of sealer plus void area or void area to that of the root canal (P > .05). Within the experimental conditions of the present study, both obturating techniques with the Epiphany sealer exhibited similar amounts of sealer and void area, regardless of the apical level of sectioning compared.

Key Words: Epiphany, gutta-percha-filled area, lateral condensation, resin-based obturation material, sealer area

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(07)00597-3

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.015

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 33, Issue 11 , Pages 1338-1341, November 2007