Journal of Endodontics
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 743-747, June 2008

Comparison of Forces Generated During Root Canal Shaping and Residual Stresses of Three Nickel–Titanium Rotary Files by Using a Three-Dimensional Finite-element Analysis

  • Hyeon-Cheol Kim, DDS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Busan, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Hyeon-Cheol Kim, DDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, 1-10, Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Busan 602-739 Korea.
  • ,
  • Gary Shun-Pan Cheung, MDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Area of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • ,
  • Chan-Joo Lee

      Affiliations

    • Division of Precision Manufacturing Systems, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
  • ,
  • Byung-Min Kim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Precision Manufacturing Systems, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
  • ,
  • Jeong-Kil Park, DDS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Busan, Korea
  • ,
  • Soon-Il Kang, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Busan, Korea

published online 28 April 2008.

Abstract 

The study was aimed to compare the stress distribution during simulated root canal shaping and to estimate the residual stress thereafter for some nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Three brands of instruments (ProFile, ProTaper, and ProTaper Universal; Dentsply Maillefer) were scanned with micro–computed tomography to produce a real-size, 3-dimensional model for each. The stresses on the instrument during simulated shaping of a root canal were analyzed numerically by using a 3-dimensional finite-element package, taking into account the nonlinear mechanical behavior of the nickel-titanium material. From the simulation, the original ProTaper design showed the greatest pull in the apical direction and the highest reaction torque from the root canal wall, whereas ProFile showed the least. In ProTaper, stresses were concentrated at the cutting edge, and the residual stress reached a level close to the critical stress for phase transformation of the material. The residual stress was highest in ProTaper followed by ProTaper Universal and ProFile.

Key Words: Finite element analysis, NiTi rotary files, residual stresses, screwing, stress distribution

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(08)00266-5

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.015

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 743-747, June 2008