Journal of Endodontics
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 583-586 , April 2009

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

  • Xin-Hua Gu, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Xin-Hua Gu, Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, PR China, 310003
  • ,
  • Cai-Yun Mao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
  • ,
  • Matthias Kern, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany

References 

  1. Gu XH, Kern M. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:918–923
  2. Bonfante EA, Pegoraro LF, de Goes MF, et al. SEM observation of the bond integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals. Dent Mater. 2008;24:483–491
  3. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:618–631
  4. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation. J Endod. 2002;28:355–360
  5. Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N. Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dent Mater. 1999;15:153–157
  6. Kenshima S, Francci C, Reis A, et al. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. J Dent. 2006;34:775–783
  7. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, et al. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:381–387
  8. de Souza FD, Pecora JD, Silva RG. The effect on coronal leakage of liquid adhesive application over root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:125–128
  9. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent. 2005;30:627–635
  10. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, et al. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35:467–475
  11. Yang B, Adelung R, Ludwig K, et al. Effect of structural change of collagen fibrils on the durability of dentin bonding. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5021–5031
  12. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29:170–175
  13. Lui JN, Kuah HG, Chen NN. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer. J Endod. 2007;33:472–475
  14. Chopra S, Murray PE, Namerow KN. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer. J Endod. 2008;34:1243–1245
  15. Carvalho AS, Camargo CH, Valera MC, et al. Smear layer removal by auxiliary chemical substances in biomechanical preparation: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod. 2008;34:1396–1400
  16. Marending M, Paque F, Fischer J, et al. Impact of irrigant sequence on mechanical properties of human root dentin. J Endod. 2007;33:1325–1328
  17. Coniglio I, Magni E, Goracci C, et al. Post space cleaning using a new nickel titanium endodontic drill combined with different cleaning regimens. J Endod. 2008;34:83–86
  18. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, et al. Ultrasound effects after post space preparation: an SEM study. J Endod. 2006;32:549–552
  19. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235
  20. Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, et al. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod. 2001;27:768–771
  21. Calt S, Serper A. Smear layer removal by EGTA. J Endod. 2000;26:459–461
  22. O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, et al. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26:739–743
  23. Guerisoli DM, Marchesan MA, Walmsley AD, et al. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J. 2002;35:418–421
  24. Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi AA, et al. The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29:233–239
  25. Saito K, Webb TD, Imamura GM, et al. Effect of shortened irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation. J Endod. 2008;34:1011–1014
  26. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod. 2002;28:17–19
  27. da Silva LA, Sanguino AC, Rocha CT, et al. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth. J Endod. 2008;34:1541–1544
  28. Tasman F, Cehreli ZC, Ogan C, et al. Surface tension of root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2000;26:586–587
  29. Pecora JD, Guimaraes LF, Savioli RN. Surface tension of several drugs used in endodontics. Braz Dent J. 1992;2:123–127
  30. Cameron JA. The effect of a fluorocarbon surfactant on the surface tension of the endodontic irrigant, sodium hypochlorite. A preliminary report. Aust Dent J. 1986;31:364–368
  31. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003;36:810–830
  32. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005;31:166–170

 Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant no. Y205702), the Medical and Health Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant no. 2007A061), and the Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province (grant No. 2009C23G2010084)

PII: S0099-2399(09)00053-3

doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.006

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 583-586 , April 2009