Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 791-804 (June 2009)


View previous. 4 of 30 View next.

Review of Contemporary Irrigant Agitation Techniques and Devices

Li-sha Gu, DDS, MS, Jong Ryul Kim, DMD, PhD, Junqi Ling, DDS, PhD, Kyung Kyu Choi, DMD, PhD, David H. Pashley, DMD, PhD, Franklin R. Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhD§Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Introduction

Effective irrigant delivery and agitation are prerequisites for successful endodontic treatment.

Methods

This article presents an overview of the irrigant agitation methods currently available and their debridement efficacy.

Results

Technological advances during the last decade have brought to fruition new agitation devices that rely on various mechanisms of irrigant transfer, soft tissue debridement, and, depending on treatment philosophy, removal of smear layers. These devices might be divided into the manual and machine-assisted agitation systems. Overall, they appear to have resulted in improved canal cleanliness when compared with conventional syringe needle irrigation. Despite the plethora of in vitro studies, no well-controlled study is available. This raises imperative concerns on the need for studies that could more effectively evaluate specific irrigation methods by using standardized debris or biofilm models. In addition, no evidence-based study is available to date that attempts to correlate the clinical efficacy of these devices with improved treatment outcomes. Thus, the question of whether these devices are really necessary remains unresolved. There also appears to be the need to refocus from a practice management perspective on how these devices are perceived by clinicians in terms of their practicality and ease of use.

Conclusions

Understanding these fundamental issues is crucial for clinical scientists to improve the design and user-friendliness of future generations of irrigant agitation systems and for manufacturers' contentions that these systems play a pivotal role in contemporary endodontics.

 Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

 Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, KyungHee University, Seoul, Korea

 Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia

§ Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia

Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Franklin R. Tay, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1129.

PII: S0099-2399(09)00199-X

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010


View previous. 4 of 30 View next.