Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 429-433, March 2010

A Prospective, Randomized Single-blind Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Administered with a Peripheral Nerve Stimulator

  • Fredric Simon, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Private practice limited to endodontics, Chevy Chase, Maryland
  • ,
  • Al Reader, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Al Reader, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, 305 West 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210.
  • ,
  • Melissa Drum, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • ,
  • John Nusstein, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • ,
  • Mike Beck, DDS, MA

      Affiliations

    • Division of Oral Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Abstract 

Introduction

The purpose of this prospective, randomized single-blind study was to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block administered by using a peripheral nerve stimulator compared with a conventional IAN block by using a cartridge of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

Methods

Forty-six adult volunteers randomly received a conventional IAN block or an IAN block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator at 2 separate appointments. An electric pulp tester was used to test for anesthesia of the first molar, first premolar, and lateral incisor in 4-minute cycles for 60minutes. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15minutes, and the 80 reading was continuously sustained through the 60th minute.

Results

With the peripheral nerve stimulator for the IAN block, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 32%–37%. For the conventional IAN block, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 32%–45%. There was no significant difference between the 2 IAN block techniques.

Conclusions

We concluded that the IAN block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator did not increase the success rate of pulpal anesthesia when compared with a conventional IAN block.

Key Words: Inferior alveolar nerve block, lidocaine, local anesthesia, peripheral nerve stimulator

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(09)01023-1

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.023

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 429-433, March 2010