Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 858-861 , May 2010

Effects of Four Instruments on Coronal Pre-enlargement by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

  • Cintia Mussoline Sanfelice, DDS

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UNICSUL), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Fernanda Botega da Costa, DDS

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UNICSUL), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Marcus Vinicius Reis Só, Rua Sousa Lobo 62 casa 03, 91320-320, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
    • ,
  • Fabiana Vier-Pelisser, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UNICSUL), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Fabiana Soares Grecca, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

References 

  1. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals. Int Endod J. 2004;37:607–612
  2. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;101:792–794
  3. Vanni JR, Santos R, Limongi O, Guerisoli DMZ, Capelli A, Pécora JD. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SE analysis. Braz Dent J. 2005;16:181–186
  4. Barroso JM, Guerisoli DMZ, Capelli A, Saquy PC, Pécora JD. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary premolars: SEM analysis. Braz Dent J. 2005;16:30–34
  5. Ibelli GS, Barroso JM, Capelli A, Spanó JCE, Pécora JD. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination in maxillary lateral incisors. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:102–106
  6. Mahran AH, AboEl-Fotouh M. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. J Endod. 2008;34:1219–1222
  7. Hartmann MSM, Barletta FB, Fontanella VRC, Vanni JR. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod. 2007;33:962–965
  8. Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A. Correr GM: Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009;35:337–342
  9. Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J. 2001;34:476–484
  10. Estrela C. Endodontic science. 2nd ed.. São Paulo, Brazil: Artes Médicas Ltda; 2009;1223
  11. Bergmann L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi Rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36:288–295
  12. Zhang L, Luo HX, Zhou XD, Tan H, Huang DM. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2008;34:456–458
  13. López FU, Fachin EVF, Fontanella VRC, Barletta FB, Só MVR, Grecca FS. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters. J Endod. 2008;34:1545–1548

PII: S0099-2399(09)01055-3

doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.003

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 858-861 , May 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution