Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 867-870 , May 2010

Efficacy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Modality to Accurately Identify the Presence of Second Mesiobuccal Canals in Maxillary First and Second Molars: A Pilot Study

  • Trevor C. Blattner

      Affiliations

    • UMKC School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Trevor C. Blattner, 4455 Madison Avenue #315S, Kansas City, MO 64111.
  • ,
  • Nathan George

      Affiliations

    • UMKC School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Charles C. Lee, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • UMKC School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Vandana Kumar, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Evans, GA
  • ,
  • Christopher D.J. Yelton, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Kansas City, MO

References 

  1. Hess W, Zurcher E. The Anatomy of the Root Canals of the Teeth of the Permanent and Deciduous Dentitions. New York, NY: William Wood & Co; 1925;
  2. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod. 1990;16:311–317
  3. Pomeranz H, Fishelberg G. The secondary mesiobuccal canal of maxillary molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88:119–124
  4. Weine FS, Healey NJ, Gerstein H, et al. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28:419–425
  5. Acosta SA, Trugeda SA. Anatomy of the pulp chamber floor of the permenent maxillary first molar. J Endod. 1978;4:214–219
  6. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod. 1999;25:446–450
  7. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, et al. Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod. 2006;32:583–587
  8. Robb RA, Sinak LJ, Hoffman EA, et al. Dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. J Med Syst. 1982;6:539–554
  9. Danforth RA, Dus I, Mah J. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003;31:817–823
  10. Filho FB, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, et al. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009;35:337–341
  11. Winter AA, Pollack AS, Frommer HH, et al. Cone beam volumetric tomography vs medical CT scanners. N Y State Dent J. 2005;71:28–33
  12. Low KMT, Dula K, Burgin W, et al. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod. 2008;34:557–561
  13. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, et al. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;33:1121–1131
  14. Huumonen S, Kvist T, Grondahl K, et al. Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 2006;39:827–833
  15. Lofghag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grohndahl K, et al. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:114–119
  16. Smadi L, Khraisat A. Detection of a second mesiobuccal canal in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molar teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:77–81

PII: S0099-2399(09)01100-5

doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 867-870 , May 2010