Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 775-780 , May 2010

Impact of a Retained Instrument on Treatment Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Piyanee Panitvisai, DDS, MDSc

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Piyanee Panitvisai, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Henri-Dunant Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
  • ,
  • Pimnalin Parunnit, Cert in Endodontics

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • Chankhrit Sathorn, DClinDent, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Harold H. Messer, MDSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Visiting Professor, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

References 

  1. Torabinejad M, Lemon R. Procedural accidents. In:  Walton R,  Torabinejad M editor. Principles and practice of endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2002;p. 310–330
  2. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, et al. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res. 1979;87:217–224
  3. Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970;80:1341–1347
  4. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979;5:83–90
  5. Pettiette MT, Conner D, Trope M. Procedural errors with the use of nickel-titatium rotary instruments in undergraduate endodontics. J Endod. 2002;28:259
  6. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504
  7. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31:845–850
  8. Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: an analytical study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1956;14(Suppl 21):1–175
  9. Cvek M, Granath L, Lundberg M. Failures and healing in endodontically treated non-vital anterior teeth with posttraumatically reduced pulpal lumen. Acta Odontol Scand. 1982;40:223–228
  10. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod. 2004;30:827–845
  11. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32:1031–1043
  12. Al-Fouzan KS. Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo. Int Endod J. 2003;36:864–867
  13. Ramirez-Salomon M, Soler-Bientz R, de la Garza-Gonzalez R, et al. Incidence of Lightspeed separation and the potential for bypassing. J Endod. 1997;23:586–587
  14. Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod. 2004;30:432–435
  15. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2004;30:722–725
  16. Fox J, Moodnik RM, Greenfield E, et al. Filing root canals with files radiographic evaluation of 304 cases. N Y State Dent J. 1972;38:154–157
  17. Zeigler PE, Serene TE. Failures in therapy. In:  Cohen S,  Burns RC editor. Pathways of the pulp. 3rd ed. St Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1984;p. 805–806
  18. Ingle J, Glick D. The Washington study. In:  Ingle J editors. Endodontics. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1965;p. 54–77
  19. Sommer RF, Ostrander FD, Crowley MC. Clinical endodontics. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1966;
  20. Feldman G, Solomon C, Notaro P, et al. Retrieving broken endodontic instruments. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88:588–591
  21. Fors UG, Berg JO. Endodontic treatment of root canals obstructed by foreign objects. Int Endod J. 1986;19:2–10
  22. Roig-Green JL. The retrieval of foreign objects from root canal: a simple aid. J Endod. 1983;9:394–397
  23. Weisman MI. The removal of difficult silver cones. J Endod. 1983;9:210–211
  24. Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod. 2005;31:450–452
  25. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J Endod. 2003;29:764–767
  26. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.2 (updated March 2004). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004;
  27. Molyvdas I, Lambrianidis T, Zervas P, et al. Clinical study on the prognosis of endodontic treatment of teeth with broken endodontic instruments. In:  Lambrianidis I editors. Risk management of root canal treatment. Thessaloniki, Greece: University Studio Press; 2001;p. 199–247
  28. Sutton A. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester/New York: John Wiley; 2000;
  29. Orstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J. 1996;29:150–155
  30. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, et al. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study—phase 4: initial treatment. J Endod. 2008;34:258–263
  31. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–1892
  32. Vetter N, Matthews I. Epidemiology and public health. Edinburgh/New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1999;
  33. Friedman S. Expected outcomes in the prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. In:  Ørstavik D,  Pitt Ford TR editor. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008;p. 408–469
  34. Suebnukarn S, Rungcharoenporn N, Sangsuratham S. A Bayesian decision support model for assessment of endodontic treatment outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:e48–e58
  35. Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int Endod J. 2005;38:112–123
  36. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod. 2003;29:756–763
  37. Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intra-canal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 2. Int Endod J. 2008;41:1079–1087
  38. Nicholls E. Endodontics. Bristol, UK: John Wright & Sons, Ltd; 1967;
  39. Siskin M. Surgical techniques applicable to endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1967;745–769
  40. Grahnén H, Hansson L. The prognosis of pulp and root canal therapy. Odontol Ravy. 1961;12:146–165
  41. Engström B, Hard L, Segerstad A, et al. Correlation of positive cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatment. Odontol Ravy. 1964;15:257–270
  42. Engström B, Lundberg M. The correlation between positive culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpectomy. Odontol Ravy. 1965;16:193–203
  43. Grossman LI. Guidelines for the prevention of fracture of root canal instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28:746–752

PII: S0099-2399(09)01106-6

doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.029

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 775-780 , May 2010