Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 7 , Pages 1179-1182 , July 2010

Root Canal Area Increase Promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper Systems: Comparison by Computed Tomography

  • Ricardo Affonso Bernardes, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CPO SL Mandic Brasiliense Dental School, Brasília, DF, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr. Ricardo Affonso Bernardes, SEPS 705/905 Centro Emp. MONT BLANC Salas 425/427, CEP: 70390-055 Brasília-DF, Brazil.
  • ,
  • Emerson Antunes Rocha, DDS

      Affiliations

    • CPO SL Mandic Brasiliense Dental School, Brasília, DF, Brazil
  • ,
  • Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, DDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Araraquara, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Alexandre S. Bramante, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CPO SL Mandic Brasiliense Dental School, Brasília, DF, Brazil
  • ,
  • José Ribamar de Azevedo, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Odonto Radiológico de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil

References 

  1. Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, De Moor RJG. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J. 2004;37:613–623
  2. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J. 2003;36:86–92
  3. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2005;38:743–752
  4. Kurtzman GM. Simplifying endodontics with EndoSequence rotary instrumentation. N Y State Dent J. 2006;72:56–59
  5. Williamson AE, Sandor AJ, Justman BC. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and Profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability. J Endod. 2009;35:107–109
  6. Herold KS, Johnson BR, Wenckus CS. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in Endosequence and profile nickel-titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model. J Endod. 2007;33:712–714
  7. Boessler C, Paque F, Peters AO. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files. J Endod. 2009;35:102–106
  8. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:401–403
  9. Bernardes RA, Gomes de Moraes I, Duarte MAH, Azevedo BC, Azevedo JR, Bramante CM. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:270–277
  10. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC, Azevedo JR, Pécora JD. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2008;34:1325–1331
  11. Shemesh H, van Soest G, Wu MK, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR. The ability of optical coherence tomography to characterize the root canal walls. J Endod. 2007;33:1369–1373
  12. Reuben J, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2008;34:212–215
  13. Paque F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M. Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2009;35:1044–1047
  14. Hartmann MSM, Barletta FB, Fontanella VRC, Vanni JR. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod. 2007;33:962–965
  15. Loizides AL, Kakavetsos VD, Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Eliades GA. Comparative study of the effects of two nickel–titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography. J Endod. 2007;33:1455–1459
  16. Arnheiter C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage. Oral Radiology. 2006;22:80–85
  17. Pasternak-Júnior B, Sousa-Neto MD, Silva RG. Canal transportation and centering ability of RaCe rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2009;42:499–506
  18. Mahran AH, AboEl-Fotouh MM. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. J Endod. 2008;34:1219–1222
  19. Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Three-dimensional analysis of cutting behavior of nickel-titanium rotary instruments by microcomputed tomography. J Endod. 2008;34:606–610
  20. Uyanik MO, Cebreli CZ, Mocan BO, Dagli FT. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod. 2006;32:668–671
  21. Wildey WL, Senia S, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg. 1992;74:499–507
  22. Royal JR, Donnelli JC. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types. J Endod. 1995;21:300–304
  23. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel-titanium instruments: applications in endodontics. St Louis, MO: Ishiyaku Euroamericana; 1995;112
  24. Lask JT, Walker MP, Kulild JC, Cunningham KP, Shull PA. Variability of the diameter and taper of size #30, 0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2006;32:1171–1173
  25. Karabucak B, Gatan AJ, Hsiao C, Iqbal MK. A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:123–125
  26. De-Deus G, Garcia-Filho P. Influence of the NiTi rotary system on the debridement quality of the root canal space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e-71–e-76

PII: S0099-2399(09)01110-8

doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.033

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 7 , Pages 1179-1182 , July 2010