Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 1289-1294, August 2010

The Operating Microscope Enhances Detection and Negotiation of Accessory Mesial Canals in Mandibular Molars

  • Meric Karapinar-Kazandag, DDS, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Meric Karapinar-Kazandag, Yeditepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Bagdat cad No:238 34728, Goztepe/Istanbul/Turkey.
  • ,
  • Bettina R. Basrani, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Discipline of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Shimon Friedman, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Discipline of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

published online 14 June 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

Detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars was investigated with the aid of magnifying loupes or the operating microscope.

Methods

First and second mandibular molars (n = 96) were mounted in mannequins. Three independent investigators (endodontists) prepared access cavities using 4.5× loupes, attempting to detect and negotiate accessory mesial canals with ultrasonic instruments. If detection or negotiation was unsuccessful, the procedure was continued using the microscope. The location of accessory mesial canals was mapped in relation to the main mesial canals, and their pathway shown with inserted files. The mesial roots were cross-sectioned at three levels to inspect for nonnegotiated accessory mesial canals.

Results

With the microscope, the number of detected accessory mesial canals increased from 8 (16%) to 9 (18%) in first molars and from 8 (16%) to 11 (22%) in second molars. Negotiated accessory mesial canals increased from 6 (12%) to 7 (14%) and from 5 (10%) to 9 (18%) in the first and second molars, respectively. All 20 detected accessory mesial canals were located in the mesial subpulpal groove, closer to the mesiolingual canal (45%), in the middle (30%), or closer to the mesiobuccal canal (25%). All negotiated accessory mesial canals merged with one of the main two canals. Cross-sections of the roots confirmed that no accessory canals were present in addition to those negotiated.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, more accessory canals were detected and negotiated when using the microscope compared with loupes. This improvement was more pronounced in second molars than in first molars. All negotiated accessory canals merged with either one of the main mesial canals.

Key Words: Accessory canals, magnifying loupes, mandibular molars, operating microscope

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(10)00377-8

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.005

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 1289-1294, August 2010