Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 1622-1627, October 2010

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Molars in an Indian Population

  • Prasanna Neelakantan, MDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to Dr Prasanna Neelakantan, Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha University, Plot 1500, 16th Main Rd, Anna Nagar West, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • ,
  • Chandana Subbarao, BDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • ,
  • Roshni Ahuja, MDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • ,
  • Chandragiri Venkata Subbarao, MDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • ,
  • James L. Gutmann, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas

published online 30 August 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

Maxillary first (n = 220) and second (n = 205) molars were collected from an indigenous Indian population and scanned by using a CBCT scanner at a constant slice thickness of 125 μm/slice. Volume rendering and multiplanar volume reconstruction were performed. The number of root canals was examined, and root canal system configurations were classified by using historical and contemporary classifications.

Results

Single-rooted first and second molars commonly showed types I, IV (0.5%) and type III (1%) canal systems, respectively. Buccal roots of two-rooted first molars showed 2 canal systems, type I and type IV, whereas second molars with 2 roots showed wide variations in canal anatomy. The most common canal morphology in the mesiobuccal roots of three-rooted first and second molars was type I (51.8% and 62%, respectively), followed by type IV (38.6% and 50%, respectively). The distobuccal and palatal roots of first and second molars showed predominantly type I canal morphology. Additional canal types were identified in 2.2% and 9.3% of the first and second molars, respectively.

Conclusions

The root number, morphology, and canal morphology of Indian maxillary molars showed features that were different from both Caucasian and Mongoloid traits. CBCT is an exciting and clinically useful tool in studying root canal morphology.

Key Words: Canal configuration, cone-beam computed tomography, Indian, maxillary molar, root canal anatomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0099-2399(10)00593-5

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.07.006

Journal of Endodontics
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 1622-1627, October 2010