Advertisement

An In Vitro Comparison of New Irrigation and Agitation Techniques to Ultrasonic Agitation in Removing Bacteria From a Simulated Root Canal

      Abstract

      Introduction

      This in vitro study compared 3 agitation and 2 irrigation devices to ultrasonic agitation at mechanically removing bacteria from a plastic simulated canal, instrumented to 35/.06.

      Methods

      The plastic blocks were divided into seven groups. The control (C) group with brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth (sterile) received only needle irrigation. The remaining groups were incubated with BHI inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. Irrigation and agitation techniques were ultrasonic, needle irrigation, EndoVac irrigation (Smart Endodontics; Discus Dental, Culver City, CA), EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), F-File (Plastic Endo, Lincolnshire, IL), and sonic. Sterile water was the irrigant in all treatments. Remaining bacteria were stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The crystal violet was extracted using a detergent and measured spectrophotometrically.

      Results

      The results of this study show that ultrasonic agitation was not significantly different (p > 0.05, Tukey test) from the control. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05, Tukey test) between the ultrasonic agitation and the use of EndoActivator, F-File, and sonic agitation. Ultrasonic agitation was significantly more effective at removing bacteria than needle irrigation and EndoVac irrigation (p < 0.05, Tukey test).

      Conclusion

      In a plastic simulated canal, ultrasonic agitation was significantly more effective than needle irrigation and EndoVac irrigation at removing intracanal bacteria. Ultrasonic, EndoActivator, F-File, and sonic agitation are similar in their ability to remove bacteria in a plastic simulated canal.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Harrison J.
        Irrigation of the root canal system.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1984; 28: 797
        • Siqueira J.F.
        • Lima D.C.
        • Magalhaes F.A.C.
        • et al.
        Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 332-335
        • Bystom A.
        • Sundqvist G.
        Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.
        Scand J Dent Res. 1981; 89: 321-328
        • Zehnder M.
        Root canal irrigants.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 389-398
        • Pataky L.
        • Ivanyi I.
        • Grigar A.
        • et al.
        Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 603-605
        • Sjögren U.
        • Figdor D.
        • Persson S.
        • et al.
        Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.
        Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 297-306
        • Siqueira J.F.
        • Magalhães K.M.
        • Rôças I.N.
        Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 667-672
        • Siqueira J.F.
        • Guimarães-Pinto T.
        • Rôças I.N.
        Effects of chemomechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on cultivable bacteria in infected root canals.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 800-805
        • Baugh D.
        The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 333-340
        • Lin L.M.
        • Pascon E.A.
        • Skribner J.
        • et al.
        Clinical, radiographic, and histologic study of endodontic treatment failures.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71: 603-611
        • Lin L.M.
        • Skribner J.E.
        • Gaengler P.
        Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures.
        J Endod. 1992; 18: 625-627
        • Siqueira Jr, J.F.
        • Rôças I.N.
        Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic treatment.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 85-94
        • Gomes B.P.
        • Pinheiro E.T.
        • Jacinto R.C.
        • et al.
        Microbial analysis of canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions using polymerase chain reaction.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 537-540
        • Siqueira J.F.
        • Rôças I.N.
        Clinical Implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1291-1301
        • Kakehashi S.
        • Stanley H.R.
        • Fitzgerald R.J.
        The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; 20: 340-349
        • Distel J.W.
        • Hatton J.F.
        • Gillespie M.J.
        Biofilm formation in medicated root canals.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 689-693
        • Donlan R.M.
        • Costerton J.W.
        Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15: 167-193
        • Duggan J.M.
        • Sedgley C.M.
        Biofilm formation of oral and endodontic Enterococcus faecalis.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 815-818
        • Carver K.
        • Nusstien J.
        • Reader A.
        • et al.
        In vivo antibacterial efficacy of ultrasound after hand and rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1038-1043
        • Sabins R.A.
        • Johnson J.D.
        • Hellstein J.W.
        A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand Instrumentation in molar root canals.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 674-677
        • Salzgeber R.M.
        • Brilliant J.D.
        An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals.
        J Endod. 1977; 3: 394-398
        • Khademi A.
        • Yazdizadeh M.
        • Feizianfard M.
        Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 417-420
        • Shea C.
        • Williamson J.C.
        Rapid analysis of bacterial adhesion in a microplate assay.
        Biotechniques. 1990; 8: 610-611
        • Schneider S.W.
        A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275
        • Jett B.D.
        • Huycke M.M.
        • Gilmore M.S.
        Virulence of enterococci.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994; 7: 462-478
        • Siren E.K.
        • Haapasalo M.P.P.
        • Ranta K.
        • et al.
        Microbiological findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiological investigation.
        Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 91-95
        • Van Merode A.E.
        • Van Der Mei H.C.
        • Busscher H.J.
        • et al.
        Influence of culture heterogeneity in cell surface charge on adhesion and biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.
        J Bacteriol. 2006; 188: 2421-2426
        • Mohamed J.A.
        • Huang W.
        • Nallapareddy S.R.
        • et al.
        Influence of origin of isolated, especially endocarditis isolates, and various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.
        Infect Immune. 2004; 72: 3658-3663
        • Dunavant T.R.
        • Regan J.D.
        • Glickman G.N.
        • et al.
        Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 527-531
        • Costerton J.W.
        • Stewart P.S.
        • Greenberg E.P.
        Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.
        Science. 1999; 284: 1318-1322
        • Donlan R.M.
        • Costerton J.W.
        Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15: 167-193
        • George S.
        • Kishen A.
        • Song P.
        The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 867-872
        • Sando J.A.
        • Witherden I.R.
        • Cove J.H.
        • et al.
        Correlation between enterococcal biofilm formation in vitro and medical-device-related infection potential in vivo.
        J Med Microbiol. 2003; 52: 547-550
        • Van der Sluis L.W.M.
        Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature.
        Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 415-426
        • Nair P.N.
        • Henry S.
        • Cano V.
        • et al.
        Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99: 231-252
        • Hockett J.L.
        • Dommisch J.K.
        • Johnson J.D.
        • et al.
        Antimicrobial efficacy of two irrigation techniques in tapered and nontapered canal preparations: an in vitro study.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1374-1377
        • Boutsioukis C.
        • Lambrianidis T.
        • Kastrinakis E.
        Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 144-155