Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Accessory Mesial Canal Identification in Mandibular First Molars by Using Four Different Diagnostic Methods

Published:February 02, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.035

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The objective of the present in vitro study was to compare 4 diagnostic methods to identify accessory mesial canals (AMCs) in lower first molars.

      Methods

      Forty-four lower first molars were selected for assessment with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), digital radiography (DR), clinical inspection (CI), and dental operating microscope (DOM). Initially, axial images were obtained by using CBCT, and radiographs were taken in ortho, mesial, and distal angulations. The images were assessed by 2 independent groups of examiners, and all of the results obtained remained undisclosed until the end of the experiment. Subsequently, root canal access was prepared, and the mesial subpulpal groove was located by using sharp endodontic explorers. The roots were examined with DOM, and all identified canals were negotiated and instrumented by using a ProTaper Rotary System. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed by nonparametric McNemar tests.

      Results

      Twelve AMCs (27.0%) were identified by CBCT, and 58.0% were instrumented. No AMCs were visualized in any DR examined. Fifteen potential AMCs (34%) were identified by CI, but only 47.0% were confirmed after instrumentation. Thirteen AMCs (30.0%) were identified by DOM, and 84.0% could be negotiated and instrumented.

      Conclusions

      There were statistically significant differences between the 4 types of assessments for AMC identification. There was good agreement between DOM and CBCT, whereas DR and CI were not as precise as either of the other 2 diagnostic methods.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Pomeranz H.
        • Eidelman D.
        • Goldberg M.
        Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars.
        J Endod. 1981; 7: 565-568
        • Fabra-Campos H.
        Unusual root anatomy of mandibular first molars.
        J Endod. 1985; 11: 568-572
        • Martinez-Berna A.
        • Badanelli P.
        Mandibular first molars with six root canals.
        J Endod. 1985; 11: 348-352
        • Goel N.
        • Gill K.
        • Taneja J.
        Study of root canals configuration in mandibular first permanent molar.
        J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1991; 8: 12-14
        • Jacobsen E.
        • Dick K.
        • Bodell R.
        Mandibular first molars with multiple mesial canals.
        J Endod. 1994; 20: 610-613
        • De Carvalho M.
        • Zuolo M.
        Orifice locating with a microscope.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 532-534
        • Yoshioka T.
        • Kobayashi C.
        • Suda H.
        Detection rate of root canal orifices with a microscope.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 452-453
        • Mortman R.E.
        • Ahn S.
        Mandibular first molars with three mesial canals.
        Gen Dent. 2003; 51: 549-551
        • Navarro L.F.
        • Luzi A.
        • García A.A.
        • García A.H.
        Third canal in the mesial root of permanent mandibular first molars: review of the literature and presentation of 3 clinical reports and 2 in vitro studies.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007; 12: E605-E609
        • Reuben J.
        • Velmurugan N.
        • Kandaswamy D.
        The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an Indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: an in vitro study.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 212-215
        • Gu Y.
        • Lu Q.
        • Wang H.
        • Ding Y.
        • Wang P.
        • Ni L.
        Root canal morphology of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars: part I—pulp floor and root canal system.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 990-994
        • Karapinar-Kazandag M.
        • Basrani B.R.
        • Friedman S.
        The operating microscope enhances detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1289-1294
        • Krithikadatta J.
        • Kottoor J.
        • Karumaran C.S.
        • Rajan G.
        Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: a case report.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1712-1716
        • Wang W.
        • Zheng Q.
        • Zhou X.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars in a western Chinese population by cone-beam computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2010; 11: 1786-1789
        • Pablo Ó
        • Estevez R.
        • Sánches M.
        • Heibon C.
        • Cohenca N.
        Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review.
        J Endod. 2010; 12: 1919-1931
        • Hsu Y.
        • Kim S.
        The resected root surface: the issue of canal isthmuses.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41: 529-540
        • Gu L.
        • Wei X.
        • Ling J.
        • Huang X.
        A microcomputed tomographic study of canal isthmuses in the mesial root of mandibular first molars in a Chinese population.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 353-356
        • Hession R.W.
        Endodontic morphology: II—a radiographic analysis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977; 44: 610-620
        • Vande Voorde H.E.
        • Odendahl D.
        • Davis J.
        Molar 4th canals: frequent cause of endodontic failure?.
        ILL Dent J. 1975; 44: 779-786
        • Corcoran J.
        • Apicella M.J.
        • Mines P.
        The effect of operator experience in locating additional canals in maxillary molars.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 15-17
        • Patel S.
        • Dawood A.
        • Ford T.
        • Whaites E.
        The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems.
        Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 818-830
        • Cotton T.
        • Geisler T.
        • Holden D.
        • Schwartz S.
        • Schindler W.
        Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1121-1132
        • Mannocci F.
        • Peru M.
        • Sherriff M.
        • Cook R.
        • Pitt Ford T.
        The isthmuses of the mesial root of mandibular molars: a micro-computed tomographic study.
        Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 558-563
        • Soğur E.
        • Baksi B.G.
        • Gröndahl H.G.
        Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography.
        Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 179-185
        • La S.H.
        • Jung D.H.
        • Kim E.C.
        • Min K.S.
        Identification of independent middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar using cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 542-545
        • Matherne R.
        • Angelopoulos C.
        • Kulild J.
        • Tira D.
        Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 87-89
        • Baratto Filho F.
        • Zaitter S.
        • Haragushiku G.A.
        • de Campos E.A.
        • Abuabara A.
        • Correr G.M.
        Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 337-342
        • Blattner T.C.
        • George N.
        • Lee C.C.
        • Kumar V.
        • Yelton C.D.
        Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 867-870
        • Saunders W.
        • Saunders E.
        Conventional endodontics and the operating microscope.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41: 415-428
        • Buhrley L.J.
        • Barrows M.J.
        • BeGole E.A.
        • Wenckus C.S.
        Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 324-327
        • Friedman S.
        Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy.
        Endodontic Topics. 2002; 2: 59-88
        • Naoum H.J.
        • Chandler N.P.
        • Love R.M.
        Conventional versus storage phosphor-plate digital images to visualize the root canal system contrasted with a radiopaque medium.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 349-352
        • Nair M.
        • Nair U.
        Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1-6
        • Reit C.
        • Hollender L.
        Radiographic evaluation of endodontic therapy and the influence of observer variation.
        Scand J Dent Res. 1983; 91: 205-212
        • Nance R.
        • Tyndall D.
        • Levin L.G.
        • Trope M.
        Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-aperture computed tomography.
        Int Endod J. 2000; 33: 392-396