Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment of the Prognosis of Apical Microsurgery



      Apical surgery is an important treatment option for teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis. Knowledge of the long-term prognosis is necessary when weighing apical surgery against alternative treatments. This study assessed the 5-year outcome of apical surgery and its predictors in a cohort for which the 1-year outcome was previously reported.


      Apical microsurgery procedures were uniformly performed using SuperEBA (Staident International, Staines, UK) or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (ProRoot MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) root-end fillings or alternatively Retroplast capping (Retroplast Trading, Rorvig, Denmark). Subjects examined at 1 year (n = 191) were invited for the 5-year clinical and radiographic examination. Based on blinded, independent assessment by 3 calibrated examiners, the dichotomous outcome (healed or nonhealed) was determined and associated with patient-, tooth-, and treatment-related variables using logistic regression.


      At the 5-year follow-up, 9 of 191 teeth were unavailable, 12 of 191 teeth were extracted, and 170 of 191 teeth were examined (87.6% recall rate). A total of 129 of 170 teeth were healed (75.9%) compared with 83.8% at 1 year, and 85.3% were asymptomatic. Two significant outcome predictors were identified: the mesial-distal bone level at ≤3 mm versus >3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (78.2% vs 52.9% healed, respectively; odds ratio = 5.10; confidence interval, 1.67-16.21; P < .02) and root-end fillings with ProRoot MTA versus SuperEBA (86.4% vs. 67.3% healed, respectively; odds ratio = 7.65; confidence interval, 2.60-25.27; P < .004).


      This study suggested that the 5-year prognosis after apical microsurgery was 8% poorer than assessed at 1 year. It also suggested that the prognosis was significantly impacted by the interproximal bone levels at the treated tooth and by the type of root-end filling material used.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


        • Eriksen H.M.
        • Kirkevang L.-L.
        • Petersson K.
        Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome: general considerations.
        Endod Topics. 2002; 2: 1-9
        • Friedman S.
        Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure).
        Endod Topics. 2002; 1: 54-78
        • Bigras B.R.
        • Johnson B.R.
        • BeGole E.A.
        • Wenckus C.S.
        Differences in clinical decision making: a comparison between specialists and general dentists.
        Oral SuSrg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106: 139-144
        • Friedman S.
        The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery.
        Endod Topics. 2005; 11: 219-261
        • von Arx T.
        • Penarrocha M.
        • Jensen S.S.
        Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 957-973
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Shah S.B.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • Karabucak B.
        • Kim S.
        Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature—part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-1765
        • Halse A.
        • Molven O.
        • Grung B.
        Follow-up after periapical surgery: the value of the one-year control.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991; 7: 246-250
        • Jesslén P.
        • Zetterqvist L.
        • Heimdahl A.
        Long-term results of amalgam versus glass ionomer cement as apical sealant after apicectomy.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 79: 101-103
        • Kvist T.
        • Reit C.
        Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 814-817
        • Rubinstein R.A.
        • Kim S.
        Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 378-383
        • Wesson C.M.
        • Gale T.M.
        Molar apicectomy with amalgam root-end filling: results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals.
        Br Dent J. 2003; 195: 707-714
        • Yazdi P.M.
        • Schou S.
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Stoltze K.
        • Kenrad B.
        • Sewerin I.
        Dentine-bonded resin composite (Retroplast) for root-end filling: a prospective clinical and radiographic study with a mean follow-up period of 8 years.
        Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 493-503
        • Rahbaran S.
        • Gilthorpe M.S.
        • Harrison S.D.
        • Gulabivala K.
        Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a retrospective study.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91: 700-709
        • Wang N.
        • Dao T.T.
        • Knight K.
        • Friedman S.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phases I and II: apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 751-761
        • Barone C.
        • Dao T.T.
        • Basrani B.B.
        • Wang N.
        • Friedman S.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study—phases 3, 4, and 5: apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 28-35
        • von Arx T.
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Hänni S.
        Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing outcome one year after periapical surgery.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 123-128
        • Molven O.
        • Halse A.
        • Grung B.
        Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 16: 432-439
        • Rud J.
        • Andreasen J.O.
        • Jensen J.E.
        Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1972; 1: 195-214
        • Zuolo M.L.
        • Ferreira M.O.
        • Gutmann J.L.
        Prognosis in periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study.
        Int Endod J. 2000; 33: 91-98
        • Song M.
        • Shin S.-J.
        • Kim E.
        Outcomes of endodontic micro-resurgery: a prospective clinical study.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 316-320
      1. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—Levels of Evidence. Available at: Accessed November 25, 2011.

        • Taschieri S.
        • Machtou P.
        • Rosano G.
        • Weinstein T.
        • Del Fabbro M.
        The influence of previous non-surgical re-treatment on the outcome of endodontic surgery.
        Minerva Stomatol. 2010; 59: 625-632
        • Gagliani M.M.
        • Gorni F.G.M.
        • Strohmenger L.
        Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: a 5-year longitudinal comparison.
        Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 320-327
        • Kim E.
        • Song J.S.
        • Jung I.Y.
        • Lee S.J.
        • Kim S.
        Prospective clinical study evaluating endodontic microsurgery outcomes for cases with lesions of endodontic origin compared with cases with lesions of combined periodontal-endodontic origin.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 546-551
        • Saunders W.P.
        A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 660-665
        • von Arx T.
        • Al-Saeed M.
        • Salvi G.E.
        Five-year changes in periodontal parameters after apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 910-918
        • Chong B.S.
        • Pitt Ford T.R.
        • Hudson M.B.
        A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 520-526
        • Lindeboom J.A.H.
        • Frenken J.W.F.H.
        • Kroon F.H.M.
        • van den Akker H.P.
        A comparative prospective randomized clinical study of MTA and IRM as root-end filling materials in single-rooted teeth in endodontic surgery.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100: 495-500
        • Christiansen R.
        • Kirkevang L.-L.
        • Hørsted-Bindslev P.
        • Wenzel A.
        Randomized clinical trial of root-end resection followed by root-end filling with mineral trioxide aggregate or smoothing of the orthograde gutta-percha root filling—1-year follow up.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 105-114
        • von Arx T.
        • Hänni S.
        • Jensen S.S.
        Clinical results with two different methods of root-end preparation and filling in apical surgery: mineral trioxide aggregate and adhesive resin composite.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1122-1129
        • Rud J.
        • Munksgaard E.C.
        • Andreasen J.O.
        • Rud V.
        • Asmussen E.
        Retrograde root filling with composite and a dentin-bonding agent. 1.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991; 7: 118-125
        • Rud J.
        • Rud V.
        • Munksgaard E.C.
        Retrograde root filling with dentin-bonded modified resin composite.
        J Endod. 1996; 22: 477-480
        • Rud J.
        • Rud V.
        • Munksgaard E.C.
        Effect of root canal contents on healing of teeth with dentin-bonded resin composite retrograde seal.
        J Endod. 1997; 23: 535-541
        • Rud J.
        • Rud V.
        • Munksgaard E.C.
        Periapical healing of mandibular molars after root-end sealing with dentine-bonded composite.
        Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 285-292
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Nattestad A.
        • Egdo P.
        • Sewerin I.
        • Munksgaard E.C.
        • Schou S.
        A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study of resin composite and glass ionomer cement for retrograde root filling.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2002; 6: 236-243
        • Pantschev A.
        • Carlsson A.P.
        • Andersson L.
        Retrograde root filing with EBA cement or amalgam.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 78: 101-104
        • Rubinstein R.A.
        • Kim S.
        Short-term observation of the results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical operation microscope and Super-EBA as root-end filling material.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 43-48