Advertisement

Management of Intracanal Separated Instruments

Published:March 18, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.033

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Intracanal separation of endodontic instruments may hinder cleaning and shaping procedures within the root canal system, with a potential impact on the outcome of treatment. The purposes of this narrative review of separated instruments were to (1) review the literature regarding treatment options, influencing factors, and complications and (2) suggest a decision-making process for their management.

      Methods

      An online search was conducted in peer-review journals listed in PubMed to retrieve clinical and experimental studies, case reports, and review articles by using the following key words: instruments, files, obstructions, fractured, separated, broken, removal, retrieval, management, bypassing, and complications with or without root canal and endodontic.

      Results

      There is a lack of high-level evidence on management of separated instruments. Conventional conservative management includes removal of or bypassing the fragment or filling the root canal system to the coronal level of the fragment. A surgical intervention remains an alternative approach. These approaches are influenced by a number of factors and may be associated with complications. On the basis of current clinical evidence, a decision-making process for management is suggested.

      Conclusions

      Guidelines for management of intracanal separated instruments have not been formulated. Decisions on management should consider the following: (1) the constraints of the root canal accommodating the fragment, (2) the stage of root canal preparation at which the instrument separated, (3) the expertise of the clinician, (4) the armamentaria available, (5) the potential complications of the treatment approach adopted, and (6) the strategic importance of the tooth involved and the presence/or absence of periapical pathosis. Clinical experience and understanding of these influencing factors as well as the ability to make a balanced decision are essential.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Strindberg L.
        The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: an analytic study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examination.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 1956; 14: 1-175
        • Torabinejad M.
        • McDonald N.J.
        Endodontic surgery.
        in: Torabinejad M. Walton R.E. Endodontics Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, St Louis2009: 357-375
        • Bahcall J.K.
        • Carp S.
        • Miner M.
        • Skidmore L.
        The causes, prevention, and clinical management of broken endodontic rotary files.
        Dent Today. 2005; 24 (74, 76, 78–80)
        • Di Fiore P.M.
        A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138 (quiz 249): 196-201
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Watts D.C.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files.
        Br Dent J. 2008; 204: 241-245
        • Tzanetakis G.N.
        • Kontakiotis E.G.
        • Maurikou D.V.
        • Marzelou M.P.
        Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 675-687
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Watts D.C.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 1.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 693-701
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • Kim J.S.
        A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 1048-1052
        • Spili P.
        • Parashos P.
        • Messer H.H.
        The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 845-850
        • Hülsmann M.
        • Schinkel I.
        Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999; 15: 252-258
        • Crump M.C.
        • Natkin E.
        Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 80: 1341-1347
        • Wu J.
        • Lei G.
        • Yan M.
        • et al.
        Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 758-763
        • Knowles K.I.
        • Hammond N.B.
        • Biggs S.G.
        • Ibarrola J.L.
        Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 14-16
        • Wolcott S.
        • Wolcott J.
        • Ishley D.
        • et al.
        Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 1139-1141
        • Fishelberg G.
        • Pawluk J.W.
        Nickel-titanium rotary-file canal preparation and intracanal file separation.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25 (20–2, 24, quiz 25, 47): 17-18
        • Ankrum M.T.
        • Hartwell G.R.
        • Truitt J.E.
        K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 234-237
        • Hülsmann M.
        • Herbst U.
        • Schäfers F.
        Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 748-756
        • Al-Fouzan K.S.
        Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 864-867
        • Baumann M.A.
        • Roth A.
        Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 88: 714-718
        • Ramirez-Solomon M.
        • Soler-Bientz R.
        • de la Garza-Gonzalez R.
        • Palacios-Garza C.M.
        Incidence of LightSpeed separation and the potential for bypassing.
        J Endod. 1997; 23: 586-587
        • Eleazer P.D.
        Lack of corrosion of stainless steel instruments in vivo by scanning electron microscope and microprobe analysis.
        J Endod. 1991; 7: 346-349
        • Grossman L.I.
        Guidelines for the prevention of fracture of root canal instruments.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969; 28: 746-752
        • Fox J.
        • Moodnik R.M.
        • Greenfield E.
        • Atkinson J.S.
        Filing root canals with files radiographic evaluation of 304 cases.
        N Y State Dent J. 1972; 38: 154-157
        • Ingle J.I.
        • Beveridge E.E.
        • Glick D.H.
        • Weichman J.A.
        Modern endodontic therapy.
        in: Ingle J.I. Bakland L.K. Endodontics. 4th ed. Williams & Wilkins, London1994: 3-48
        • Panitvisai P.
        • Parunnit P.
        • Sathorn C.
        • Messer H.H.
        Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 775-780
        • Murad M.
        • Murray C.
        Impact of retained separated endodontic instruments during root canal treatment on clinical outcomes remains uncertain.
        J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011; 11: 87-88
        • Parashos P.
        • Messer H.H.
        Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 1031-1043
        • Ward J.R.
        • Parashos P.
        • Messer H.H.
        Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 764-767
        • Shen Y.
        • Peng P.
        • Cheung G.S.
        Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98: 605-610
        • Cujé J.
        • Bargholz C.
        • Hülsmann M.
        The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice.
        Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 545-554
        • Ward J.R.
        • Parashos P.
        • Messer H.H.
        Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 756-763
        • Gencoglu N.
        • Helvacioglu D.
        Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems.
        Eur J Dent. 2009; 3: 90-95
        • Ruddle C.J.
        Broken instrument removal: the endodontic challenge.
        Dent Today. 2002; 21 (74, 76 passim): 70-72
        • Nagai O.
        • Tani N.
        • Kayaba Y.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals.
        Int Endod J. 1986; 19: 298-304
        • Suter B.
        • Lussi A.
        • Sequeira P.
        Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
        Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 112-123
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        • Watts D.C.
        Factors affecting temperature rise on the external root surface during ultrasonic retrieval of intracanal separated files.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1089-1092
        • Ruddle C.J.
        Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment.
        J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004; 32: 474-484
        • Ruddle C.J.
        Nonsurgical retreatment.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 827-845
        • Hülsmann M.
        Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1993; 9: 223-237
        • Himel V.T.
        • Levitan M.E.
        Use of nickel titanium instruments for cleaning and shaping root canal systems.
        Tex Dent J. 2003; 120: 262-268
        • Pine J.
        What happens if you break a file during a root canal procedure?.
        Oral Health. 1996; 86: 29
        • Terauchi Y.
        • O'Leary L.
        • Kikuchi I.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 585-588
        • Terauchi Y.
        • O'Leary L.
        • Suda H.
        Removal of separated files from root canals with a new file-removal system: case reports.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 789-797
        • Cattoni M.
        Common failures in endodontics and their corrections.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1963; 7: 383-399
        • Feldman G.
        • Solomon C.
        • Notaro P.
        • Moskowitz E.
        Retrieving broken endodontic instruments.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1974; 88: 588-591
        • Roig-Greene J.L.
        The retrieval of foreign objects from root canals: a simple aid.
        J Endod. 1983; 9: 394-397
        • Eleazer P.D.
        • O'Connor R.P.
        Innovative uses for hypodermic needles in endodontics.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 190-191
        • Johnson W.B.
        • Beatty R.G.
        Clinical technique for the removal of root canal obstructions.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1988; 117: 473-476
        • Suter B.
        A new method for retrieving silver points and separated instruments from root canals.
        J Endod. 1998; 24: 446-448
        • Friedman S.
        • Stabholz A.
        • Tamse A.
        Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique—3: retreatment techniques.
        J Endod. 1990; 16: 543-549
        • Okiji T.
        Modified usage of the Masserann kit for removing intracanal broken instruments.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 466-467
        • Yoldas O.
        • Oztunc H.
        • Tinaz C.
        • Alparslan N.
        Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 513-517
        • Levy G.
        [Canal Finder System 89: improvements and indications after 4 years of experimentation and use].
        Rev Odontostomatol (Paris). 1990; 19: 327-336
        • Hülsmann M.
        Removal of fractured root canal instruments using the Canal Finder System.
        Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990; 45: 229-232
        • Plotino G.
        • Pameijer C.H.
        • Grande N.M.
        • Somma F.
        Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 81-95
        • Ruddle C.
        Microendodontics: eliminating intracanal obstructions.
        Oral Health. 1997; 87 (23–4): 19-21
        • D'Arcangelo C.
        • Varvara G.
        • De Fazio P.
        Broken instrument removal: two cases.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 368-370
        • Krell K.V.
        • Fuller M.W.
        • Scott G.L.
        The conservative retrieval of silver cones in difficult cases.
        J Endod. 1984; 10: 269-273
        • Nehme W.
        A new approach for the retrieval of broken instruments.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 633-635
        • Fu M.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Hou B.
        Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 619-622
        • Rahimi M.
        • Parashos P.
        A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 264-270
        • Yu D.G.
        • Kimura Y.
        • Tomita Y.
        • et al.
        Study on removal effects of filling materials and broken files from root canals using pulsed Nd:YAG laser.
        J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2000; 18: 23-28
        • Ebihara A.
        • Takashina M.
        • Anjo T.
        • et al.
        Removal of root canal obstructions using pulsed Nd:YAG laser.
        ICS Lasers in Dentistry. 2003; 1248: 257-259
        • Ruddle C.
        Microendodontics: eliminating intracanal obstructions.
        Dent Today. 1996; 15 (48–9): 44-46
        • Ormiga F.
        • da Cunha Ponciano Gomes J.A.
        • de Araujo M.C.
        Dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic files via an electrochemical process: a new concept for future retrieval of fractured files in root canals.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 717-720
        • Sano S.
        A clinical study on the removal of the broken instrument in the root canal using Masserann kit.
        Kanagawashiikagu. 1974; 9: 50-57
        • Alomairy K.H.
        Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 559-562
        • Landers D.H.
        New techniques for removing separated root canal instruments.
        N Y State Dent J. 1996; 62: 30-32
        • Wei X.
        • Ling J.Q.
        • Gao Y.
        • et al.
        Management of intracanal separated instruments with the microsonic technique and its clinical outcome.
        Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004; 39: 379-381
        • Nevares G.
        • Cunha R.S.
        • Zuolo M.L.
        • Bueno C.E.
        Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 442-444
        • Souter N.J.
        • Messer H.H.
        Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 450-452
        • Hülsmann M.
        Removal of silver cones and fractured instruments using the Canal Finder System.
        J Endod. 1990; 16: 596-600
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Watts D.C.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 2.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 1079-1087
        • Pitt Ford T.R.
        • Rhodes J.S.
        • Pitt Ford H.E.
        Root canal retreatment.
        in: Endodontics: Problem-solving in Clinical Practice. Martin Dunitz, London2002: 137-148
        • Gluskin A.H.
        • Ruddle C.J.
        • Zinman E.J.
        Thermal injury through intraradicular heat transfer using ultrasonic devices: precautions and practical preventive strategies.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 1286-1293
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        • Watts D.C.
        Efficiency of a newly designed ultrasonic unit and tips in reducing temperature rise on root surface during the removal of fractured files.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 896-899
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        • Watts D.C.
        A microcomputed tomography scanning study of root canal space: changes after the ultrasonic removal of fractured files.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 125-128
        • Madarati A.A.
        • Qualtrough A.J.
        • Watts D.C.
        Vertical fracture resistance of roots after ultrasonic removal of fractured instruments.
        Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 424-429
        • Hegde R.
        • Sumanth S.
        • Padhye A.
        Microscope-enhanced periodontal therapy: a review and report of four cases.
        J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009; 10: E088-E096
        • Tang Y.
        • Li X.
        • Yin S.
        Outcomes of MTA as root-end filling in endodontic surgery: a systematic review.
        Quintessence Int. 2010; 41: 557-566
        • Song M.
        • Shin S.J.
        • Kim E.
        Outcomes of endodontic micro-resurgery: a prospective clinical study.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 316-320
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Shah S.B.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • et al.
        Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature—part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-1765