Advertisement

Tooth Retention through Endodontic Microsurgery or Tooth Replacement Using Single Implants: A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcomes

Published:October 09, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.002

      Highlights

      • The outcomes of tooth retention through endodontic microsurgery and tooth replacement using an implant supported single crown were compared.
      • Single implants and endodontic microsurgery were not directly compared in the literature.
      • There were more data found for single implants than for endodontic microsurgery, but the endodontic microsurgery studies had a slightly higher quality rating.
      • At 4–6 years, single implants had higher survival rates than teeth treated with endodontic microsurgery.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Clinicians are regularly confronted with difficult choices. Should a tooth that has not healed through nonsurgical root canal treatment be treated through endodontic microsurgery or be replaced using a single implant? Acquiring complete, unbiased information to help clinicians and their patients make these choices requires a systematic review of the literature on treatment outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of tooth retention through endodontic microsurgery to tooth replacement using an implant supported single crown.

      Methods

      Searches performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were enriched by citation mining. Inclusion criteria were defined. Sentinel articles were identified and included in the final selection of studies. Weighted survival and success rates for single implants and endodontic microsurgery were calculated.

      Results

      The quality of the articles reporting on single implants and endodontic microsurgery was moderate. Data for single implants were much more plentiful than for endodontic microsurgery, but the endodontic microsurgery studies had a slightly higher quality rating. Single implants and endodontic microsurgery were not directly compared in the literature. Outcomes criteria were often unclear. At 4–6 years, single implants had higher survival rates than teeth treated with endodontic microsurgery. Qualitatively different success criteria precluded valid comparison of success rates.

      Conclusions

      Survival rates for single implants and endodontic microsurgery were both high (higher for single implants). Appraisal was limited by a lack of direct treatment comparisons. Long-term studies with a broad range of carefully defined outcomes criteria are needed.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Bader H.I.
        Treatment planning for implants versus root canal therapy: a contemporary dilemma.
        Implant Dent. 2002; 11: 217-223
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Goodacre C.J.
        Endodontic or dental implant therapy: the factors affecting treatment planning.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137: 973-977
        • White S.N.
        • Miklus V.G.
        • Potter K.S.
        • et al.
        Endodontics and implants, a catalog of therapeutic contrasts.
        J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2006; 6: 101-109
        • Doyle S.L.
        • Hodges J.S.
        • Pesun I.J.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting outcomes for single-tooth implants and endodontic restorations.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 399-402
        • John V.
        • Chen S.
        • Parashos P.
        Implant or the natural tooth–a contemporary treatment planning dilemma?.
        Austr Dent J. 2007; 52: S138-S150
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Kim S.
        A review of factors influencing treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 519-529
        • Zitzmann N.U.
        • Krastl G.
        • Hecker H.
        • et al.
        Endodontics or implants? A review of decisive criteria and guidelines for single tooth restorations and full arch reconstructions.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 757-774
        • Avila G.
        • Galindo-Moreno P.
        • Soehren S.
        • et al.
        A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction.
        J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 476-491
        • Zitzmann N.U.
        • Krastl G.
        • Hecker H.
        • et al.
        Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104: 80-91
        • Bateman G.
        • Barclay C.W.
        • Saunders W.P.
        Dental dilemmas: endodontics or dental implants?.
        SADJ. 2011; 66: 10-16
        • Davies S.J.
        The dental implant: first or last option?.
        Dent Update. 2013; 40: 145
        • Doyle S.L.
        • Hodges J.S.
        • Pesun I.J.
        • et al.
        Retrospective cross sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 822-827
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Anderson P.
        • Bader J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 285-311
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Kim S.
        For teeth requiring endodontic treatment, what are the differences in outcomes of restored endodontically treated teeth compared to implant-supported restorations?.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 96-116
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Lozada J.
        • Puterman I.
        • White S.N.
        Endodontic therapy or single tooth implant? A systematic review.
        J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008; 36: 429-437
        • Hannahan J.P.
        • Eleazer P.D.
        Comparison of success of implants versus endodontically treated teeth.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1302-1305
        • Levin L.
        • Halperin Sternfeld M.
        Tooth preservation or implant placement: a systematic review of long-term tooth and implant survival rates.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144: 1119-1133
        • Aquilino S.A.
        • Shugars D.A.
        • Bader J.D.
        • White B.A.
        Ten-year survival rates of teeth adjacent to treated and untreated posterior bounded edentulous spaces.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 455-460
        • Rehmann P.
        • Orbach K.
        • Ferger P.
        • Wostmann B.
        Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 147-150
        • Moiseiwitsch J.
        • Caplan D.
        A cost-benefit comparison between single tooth implant and endodontics.
        J Endod. 2001; 27: 235
        • Moiseiwitsch J.
        Do dental implants toll the end of endodontics?.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93: 633-634
        • Goodacre C.J.
        • Bernal G.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        • Kan J.Y.
        Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 121-132
        • Balevi B.
        • Shepperd S.
        The management of an endodontically abscessed tooth: patient health state utility, decision-tree and economic analysis.
        BMC Oral Health. 2007; 7: 17
        • Pennington M.W.
        • Vernazza C.R.
        • Shackley P.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of root canal treatment using conventional approaches versus replacement with an implant.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 874-883
        • Christensen G.J.
        Why are dental implants not used more in the United States?.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143: 903-905
        • Vogel R.
        • Smith-Palmer J.
        • Valentine W.
        Evaluating the health economic implications and cost-effectiveness of dental implants: a literature review.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 343-356
        • Kim S.G.
        • Solomon C.
        Cost-effectiveness of endodontic molar retreatment compared with fixed partial dentures and single-tooth implant alternatives.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 321-325
        • Hamedy R.
        • Shakiba B.
        • Fayazi S.
        • et al.
        Patient-centered endodontic outcomes: a narrative review.
        Iran Endod J. 2013; 8: 197-204
        • Greenstein G.
        • Cavallaro J.
        • Tarnow D.
        When to save or extract a tooth in the esthetic zone: a commentary.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29: 136-145
        • Berman L.H.
        Endodontic prognosis assessment.
        Alpha Omegan. 2011; 104: 12-17
        • Wuchenich G.
        • Meadows D.
        • Torabinejad M.
        A comparison between two root end preparation techniques in human cadavers.
        J Endod. 1994; 20: 279-282
        • Hepworth M.J.
        • Friedman S.
        Treatment outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of endodontic failures.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 1997; 63: 364-371
        • Tsesis I.
        • Rosen E.
        • Schwartz-Arad D.
        • Fuss Z.
        Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 412-416
        • Saunders W.P.
        A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 660-665
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • Shah S.B.
        • et al.
        Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature, part 2: comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 1-10
        • Kim S.
        Modern endodontic practice: instruments and techniques.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 1-9
        • Torabinejad M.
        Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate.
        Alpha Omegan. 2004; 97: 23-31
        • Pichardo M.R.
        • George S.W.
        • Bergeron B.E.
        • et al.
        Apical leakage of root-end placed SuperEBA, MTA, and Geristore restorations in human teeth previously stored in 10% formalin.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 956-959
        • Kim S.
        • Kratchman S.
        Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 601-623
        • Taschieri S.
        • Del Fabbro M.
        • Testori T.
        • et al.
        Endodontic surgery using 2 different magnification devices: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 235-242
        • Taschieri S.
        • Del Fabbro M.
        • Testori T.
        • et al.
        Use of a surgical microscope and endoscope to maximize the success of periradicular surgery.
        Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006; 18: 193-198
        • Kratchman S.I.
        Endodontic microsurgery.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28: 399-405
        • Del Fabbro M.
        • Taschieri S.
        • Lodi G.
        • et al.
        Magnification devices for endodontic therapy.
        The Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 3: CD005969
        • Chong B.S.
        • Pitt Ford T.R.
        • Hudson M.B.
        A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery. 2003.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 414-420
        • Song M.
        • Chung W.
        • Lee S.J.
        • Kim E.
        Long-term outcome of the cases classified as successes based on short-term follow-up in endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 1192-1196
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Corr R.
        • Handysides R.
        • Shabahang S.
        Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 930-937
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Shah S.B.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • et al.
        Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature–part 1: Comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-1765
        • Creasy J.E.
        • Mines P.
        • Sweet M.
        Surgical trends among endodontists: the results of a web-based survey.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 30-34
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Kratchman S.I.
        • Guess G.M.
        • et al.
        Microscopic periradicular surgery: perioperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes and quality of life assessment.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 239-244
        • Bader J.
        • Ismail A.
        Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135: 464-473
        • Manor Y.
        • Oubaid S.
        • Mardinger O.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of early versus late implant failure: a retrospective study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 67: 2649-2652
        • Bax L.
        • Yu L.
        • Ikeda N.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6: 50
        • Andersson L.
        • Emami-Kristiansen Z.
        • Hogstrom J.
        Single-tooth implant treatment in the anterior region of the maxilla for treatment of tooth loss after trauma: a retrospective clinical and interview study.
        Dent Traumatol. 2003; 19: 126-131
        • Bilhan H.
        • Mumcu E.
        • Geckili O.
        • Atalay B.
        The evaluation of the success of immediately placed single implants: a retrospective clinical study.
        Implant Dent. 2011; 20: 215-225
        • Block M.
        • Finger I.
        • Castellon P.
        • Lirettle D.
        Single tooth immediate provisional restoration of dental implants: technique and early results.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 1131-1138
        • Crespi R.
        • Cappare P.
        • Gherlone E.
        Fresh-socket implants in periapical infected sites in humans.
        J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 378-383
        • De Bruyn H.
        • Atashkadeh M.
        • Cosyn J.
        • van de Velde T.
        Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite implants installed with flapless or flap surgery.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13: 175-183
        • Finne K.
        • Rompen E.
        • Toljanic J.
        Three-year prospective multicenter study evaluating marginal bone levels and soft tissue health around a one-piece implant system.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 458-466
        • Groisman M.
        • Frossard W.M.
        • Ferreira H.M.
        • et al.
        Single-tooth implants in the maxillary incisor region with immediate provisionalization: 2-year prospective study.
        Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003; 15: 115-122
        • Krennmair G.
        • Schmidinger S.
        • Waldenberger O.
        Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 78-85
        • Mangano C.
        • Mangano F.
        • Piattelli A.
        • et al.
        Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 394-400
        • Norton M.R.
        • Wilson J.
        Dental implants placed in extraction sites implanted with bioactive glass: human histology and clinical outcome.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 249-257
        • Ottoni J.M.
        • Oliveira Z.F.
        • Mansini R.
        • Cabral A.M.
        Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 769-776
        • Turkyilmaz I.
        • Avci M.
        • Kuran S.
        • Ozbek E.N.
        A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007; 9: 222-227
        • Schropp L.
        • Kostopoulos L.
        • Wenzel A.
        • Isidor F.
        Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 480-487
        • Covani U.
        • Crespi R.
        • Cornelini R.
        • Barone A.
        Immediate implants supporting single crown restoration: a 4-year prospective study.
        J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 982-988
        • Dhanrajani P.J.
        • Al-Rafee M.A.
        Single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective study.
        Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 125-130
        • Jung U.W.
        • Choi J.Y.
        • Kim C.S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: a 5-year comparative study.
        J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 1857-1863
        • Koo K.T.
        • Wikesjo U.M.
        • Park J.Y.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of single-tooth implants in the second molar region: a 5-year life-table analysis of a retrospective study.
        J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 1242-1249
        • Mericske-Stern R.
        • Grutter L.
        • Rosch R.
        • Mericske E.
        Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 309-318
        • Morris H.F.
        • Winkler S.
        • Ochi S.
        A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
        J Oral Implantol. 2001; 27: 180-186
        • Romanos G.E.
        • Nentwig G.H.
        Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 831-836
        • Bianchi A.E.
        • Sanfilippo F.
        Single-tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year clinical evaluation.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 269-277
        • Doring K.
        • Eisenmann E.
        • Stiller M.
        Functional and esthetic considerations for single-tooth Ankylos implant-crowns: 8 years of clinical performance.
        J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30: 198-209
        • Gotfredsen K.
        A 10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 80-87
        • MacDonald K.
        • Pharoah M.
        • Todescan R.
        • Deporter D.
        Use of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants to restore single teeth in the maxilla: a 7- to 9-year follow-up.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29: 191-199
        • Misch C.E.
        • Misch-Dietsh F.
        • Silc J.
        • et al.
        Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period: a retrospective report.
        J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 2378-2382
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Karoussis I.
        • Burgin W.
        • et al.
        Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 185-193
        • Vigolo P.
        • Givani A.
        • Majzoub Z.
        • Cordioli G.
        Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 703-709
        • Becker W.
        • Goldstein M.
        • Becker B.E.
        • et al.
        Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: follow-up results from a multicenter study.
        J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 347-352
        • Norton M.R.
        A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 274-281
        • Sammartino G.
        • Marenzi G.
        • di Lauro A.E.
        • Paolantoni G.
        Aesthetics in oral implantology: biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects.
        Implant Dent. 2007; 16: 54-65
        • Tsirlis A.T.
        Clinical evaluation of immediate loaded upper anterior single implants.
        Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 94-103
        • Zarone F.
        • Sorrentino R.
        • Vaccaro F.
        • Russo S.
        Prosthetic treatment of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis with osseointegrated implants: a 24-39-month prospective clinical study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 94-101
        • Anner R.
        • Better H.
        • Chaushu G.
        The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants.
        J Periodontol. 2005; 76: 1013-1015
        • Calandriello R.
        • Tomatis M.
        Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System(R) Wide Platform TiUnite implants: a 5-year follow-up report of a prospective clinical multicenter study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13: 311-318
        • Gibbard L.L.
        • Zarb G.
        A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 2002; 68: 110-116
        • Fugazzotto P.A.
        A retrospective analysis of implants immediately placed in sites with and without periapical pathology in sixty-four patients.
        J Periodontol. 2012; 83: 182-186
        • Mayer T.M.
        • Hawley C.E.
        • Gunsolley J.C.
        • Feldman S.
        The single-tooth implant: a viable alternative for single-tooth replacement.
        J Periodontol. 2002; 73: 687-693
        • Nentwig G.H.
        Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application.
        J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30: 171-177
        • Prosper L.
        • Gherlone E.F.
        • Redaelli S.
        • Quaranta M.
        Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18: 856-864
        • Wennstrom J.L.
        • Ekestubbe A.
        • Grondahl K.
        • et al.
        Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 567-574
        • Zafiropoulos G.G.
        • Deli G.
        • Bartee B.K.
        • Hoffmann O.
        Single-tooth implant placement and loading in fresh and regenerated extraction sockets. Five-year results: a case series using two different implant designs.
        J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 604-615
        • Calvo-Guirado J.L.
        • Gomez-Moreno G.
        • Lopez-Mari L.
        • et al.
        Crestal bone loss evaluation in osseotite expanded platform implants: a 5-year study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 1409-1414
        • Fugazzotto P.A.
        • Beagle J.R.
        • Ganeles J.
        • et al.
        Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in function. A retrospective study.
        J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 327-332
        • Jemt T.
        Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21: 400-408
        • Rubinstein R.A.
        • Kim S.
        Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 378-383
        • Chong B.S.
        • Pitt Ford T.R.
        • Hudson M.B.
        A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 520-526
        • Taschieri S.
        • Del Fabbro M.
        • Testori T.
        • Weinstein R.
        Microscope versus endoscope in root-end management: a randomized controlled study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 37: 1022-1026
        • Taschieri S.
        • Del Fabbro M.
        Endoscopic endodontic microsurgery: 2-year evaluation of healing and functionality.
        Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23: 23-30
        • Taschieri S.
        • Corbella S.
        • Tsesis I.
        • et al.
        Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment of through-and-through lesions: a retrospective study at 4-year follow-up.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 15: 153-159
        • von Arx T.
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Hanni S.
        • Friedman S.
        Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 570-579
        • Misch C.E.
        • Perel M.L.
        • Wang H.L.
        • et al.
        Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference.
        Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 5-15
        • Albrektsson T.
        • Zarb G.
        • Worthington P.
        • Eriksson A.R.
        The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25
        • Albrektsson T.
        • Isidor F.
        Consensus report of session IV.
        in: Lang N.P. Karring T. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. Quintessence, London1993: 365-369
        • Buser D.
        • Weber H.P.
        • Lang N.P.
        Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990; 1: 33-40
        • Molven O.
        • Halse A.
        • Grung B.
        Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 16: 432-439
        • Andreasen J.O.
        • Rud J.
        Correlation between histology and radiography in the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1972; 1: 161-173
        • Creugers N.H.
        • Kreulen C.M.
        • Snoek P.A.
        • de Kanter R.J.
        A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants.
        J Dent. 2000; 28: 209-217
        • Ray H.A.
        • Trope M.
        Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration.
        Int Endod J. 1995; 28: 12-18
        • Salehrabi R.
        • Rotstein I.
        Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological study.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 846-850
        • Carr A.
        • Wolfaardt J.
        • Garrett N.
        Capturing patient benefits of treatment.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 85-92
        • Wannfors K.
        • Smedberg J.I.
        A prospective clinical evaluation of different single-tooth restoration designs on osseointegrated implants. A 3-year follow-up of Branemark implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10: 453-458
        • Gerritsen A.E.
        • Allen P.F.
        • Witter D.J.
        • et al.
        Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 126
        • Okoje V.N.
        • Dosumu O.O.
        • Alonge T.O.
        • Onyeaso C.
        Tooth loss: are the patients prepared?.
        Niger J Clin Pract. 2012; 15: 172-175
        • Saintrain M.V.
        • de Souza E.H.
        Impact of tooth loss on the quality of life.
        Gerodontology. 2012; 29: e632-e636
        • Hansson P.
        • Sunnegardh-Gronberg K.
        • Bergdahl J.
        • et al.
        Relationship between natural teeth and memory in a healthy elderly population.
        Eur J Oral Sci. 2013; 121: 333-340
        • Alves C.C.
        • Neves M.
        Tapered implants: from indications to advantages.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29: 161-167
        • Misch C.E.
        The importance of dental implants.
        Gen Dent. 2001; 49: 38-45
        • Karthik K.
        • Sivakumar
        • Sivaraj
        • Thangaswamy V.
        Evaluation of implant success: a review of past and present concepts.
        J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013; 5: S117-S119
        • Lindhe J.
        • Meyle J.
        • Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology
        Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 282-285
        • Zitzmann N.U.
        • Scherrer S.
        • Weiger R.
        • et al.
        Preferences of dental care providers in maintaining compromised teeth in relation to their professional status: implants instead of periodontally involved maxillary molars?.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 143-150
        • Junges R.
        • Zitzmann N.U.
        • Walter C.
        • Rosing C.K.
        Dental care providers.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 1027-1033