Clinical research| Volume 34, ISSUE 6, P656-659, June 2008

Anesthetic Efficacy of the Gow-Gates Injection and Maxillary Infiltration with Articaine and Lidocaine for Irreversible Pulpitis

Published:April 28, 2008DOI:


      The aim of this randomized, double-blinded study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (AE) with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (LE) for Gow-Gates blocks and maxillary infiltrations in patients experiencing irreversible pulpitis in mandibular and maxillary posterior teeth. Forty patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis of a posterior tooth randomly received either AE or LE by using a Gow-Gates injection or maxillary infiltration. Endodontic access was initiated after no response to Endo-ice 15 minutes after solution deposition. Success was defined as none to mild pain on a visual analogue scale after access. Chi-square and analysis of variance statistical tests were used to analyze the data. Successful endodontic treatment substantially reduced the assessment of pulpitis pain by patients (analysis of variance, P < .0001). Overall anesthetic success in both dental arches was 87.5%. Anesthetic success was not influenced by tooth arch (χ2, P > .7515) or gender (χ2, P > .1115). AE proved to be as effective but not superior to LE (P > .6002). These results demonstrated the similar anesthetic effectiveness of AE and LE when used during the endodontic treatment of teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Malamed S.F.
        • Gagnon S.
        • LeBlanc D.
        Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132: 177-185
        • Oertel R.
        • Rahn R.
        • Kirch W.
        Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine.
        Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 33: 417-425
        • Jakobs W.
        • Ladwig B.
        • Cichon P.
        Serum levels of articaine 2% and 4% in children.
        Anesth Prog. 1995; 42: 113-115
        • Malamed S.F.
        Handbook of local anesthesia.
        5th ed. Mosby, St Louis2004
        • Wright G.Z.
        • Weinberger S.J.
        • Friedman C.S.
        • Plotzke O.B.
        The use of articaine local anesthesia in children under 4 years of age: a retrospective report.
        Anesth Prog. 1989; 36: 268-271
        • Moller R.A.
        • Covino B.G.
        Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of articaine compared with bupivicaine and lidocaine.
        Anesth Analg. 1993; 76: 1266-1273
        • Oertel R.
        • Ebert U.
        • Rahn R.
        • Kirch W.
        The effect of age on pharmacokinetics of the local anesthetic drug articaine.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999; 24: 524-528
        • Malamed S.F.
        • Gagnon S.
        • Leblanc D.
        A comparison between articaine HCL and lidocaine HCL in pediatric dental patients.
        Pediatr Dent. 2000; 22: 307-311
        • Donaldson D.
        • James-Perdok L.
        • Craig B.J.
        • Derkson G.D.
        • Richardson A.S.
        A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 1987; 53: 38-42
        • Haas D.A.
        • Harper D.G.
        • Saso M.A.
        • Young E.R.
        Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.
        Anesth Prog. 1990; 37: 230-237
        • Haas D.A.
        • Harper D.G.
        • Saso M.A.
        • Young E.R.
        Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anesthesia.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 1991; 57: 217-223
        • Claffey E.
        • Reader A.
        • Nusstein J.
        • Beck M.
        • Weaver J.
        Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for IAN in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 568-571
        • Milles M.
        The missed inferior alveolar nerve block: a new look at an old problem.
        Anesth Progress. 1984; 31: 87-90
        • Madan G.
        • Madan S.
        • Madan A.
        Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133: 843-846
        • Hargreaves K.M.
        • Keiser K.
        Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management.
        Endod Topics. 2002; 1: 26-39
        • Gow-Gates G.A.
        Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a new technique using extraoral landmarks.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973; 36: 321-328
        • Malamed S.F.
        The Gow-Gates mandibular block: evaluation after 4,275 cases.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 51: 463-467
        • Watson J.E.
        • Gow-Gates G.A.E.
        A clinical evaluation of the Gow-Gates mandibular block technique.
        N Z Dent J. 1976; 72: 220-223
        • Levy T.P.
        An assessment of the Gow-Gates mandibular block for third molar surgery.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1981; 103: 37-41
        • Robertson W.D.
        Clinical evaluation of mandibular conduction anesthesia.
        Gen Dent. 1979; 27: 49-51
        • Cruz E.V.
        • Quengua J.B.
        • Gutierrez I.L.
        • Abreu M.A.
        • Uy H.G.
        A comparative study: classical, Akinosi, and Gow-Gates techniques of mandibular nerve block.
        J Philipp Dent Assoc. 1994; 46: 13-19
        • Nusstein J.
        • Reader A.
        • Nist R.
        • Beck M.
        • Meyers W.J.
        Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2 % lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in irreversible pulpitis.
        J Endod. 1998; 24: 487-491
        • Reisman D.
        • Reader A.
        • Nist R.
        • Beck M.
        • Weaver J.
        Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivicaine in irreversible pulpitis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997; 84: 676-682
        • Lai T.N.
        • Lin C.P.
        • Kok S.H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of mandibular block using a standardized method.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 462-468
        • Hung P.C.
        • Chang H.H.
        • Yang P.J.
        • Kuo Y.S.
        • Lan W.H.
        • Lin C.P.
        Comparison of the Gow-Gates mandibular block and inferior alveolar nerve block using a standardized protocol.
        J Formos Med Assoc. 2006; 105: 139-146
        • Heft M.W.
        • Parker S.R.
        An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.
        Pain. 1984; 19: 153-161
        • Mikesell P.
        • Nusstein J.
        • Reader A.
        • Beck M.
        • Weaver J.
        A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 265-270
        • Bigby J.
        • Reader A.
        • Nusstein J.
        • Beck M.
        • Weaver J.
        Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 1044-1047
        • Fernandez C.
        • Reader A.
        • Beck M.
        • Nusstein J.
        A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 499-503
        • Kanaa M.D.
        • Whitworth J.M.
        • Corbett I.P.
        • Meechan J.G.
        Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 296-298
        • Rosenquist J.
        • Rosenquist K.
        • Lee P.
        Comparison between lidocaine and bupivacaine as local anesthetics with diflunisal for postoperative pain control after lower third molar surgery.
        Anesth Prog. 1988; 35: 1-4
        • Binshtok A.M.
        • Bean B.P.
        • Woolf C.J.
        Inhibition of nociceptors by TRPV1-mediated entry of impermeant sodium channel blockers.
        Nature. 2007; 449: 607-610
        • Vahatalo K.
        • Antila H.
        • Lehtinen R.
        Articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
        Anesth Prog. 1993; 40: 114-116