Advertisement

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

  • Xin-Hua Gu
    Correspondence
    Address requests for reprints to Dr Xin-Hua Gu, Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, PR China, 310003
    Affiliations
    Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Cai-Yun Mao
    Affiliations
    Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Matthias Kern
    Affiliations
    Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigating solutions on smear layer removal and dentinal tubule opening on root canal surfaces after post space preparation and to study whether additional ultrasonic irrigation has any effect on smear layer removal. Forty-eight anterior teeth were treated endodontically. After post space preparation, they were assigned to six groups: group 1, EDTA; group 2, EDTA with ultrasonic activation; group 3, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); group 4, NaOCl with ultrasonic activation; group 5, sodium chloride (NaCl); and group 6, NaCl with ultrasonic activation. Specimens were examined under a field-emission scanning electron microscope and scored for debris removal and dentinal tubule opening at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal. The results showed that EDTA performed significantly better than NaCl and NaOCl in smear layer removal and dentinal tubule opening. Additional ultrasonic irrigation did not improve smear layer removal significantly.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Gu X.H.
        • Kern M.
        Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33: 918-923
        • Bonfante E.A.
        • Pegoraro L.F.
        • de Goes M.F.
        • et al.
        SEM observation of the bond integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals.
        Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 483-491
        • Pashley D.H.
        • Ciucchi B.
        • Sano H.
        • et al.
        Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents.
        Quintessence Int. 1993; 24: 618-631
        • Vichi A.
        • Grandini S.
        • Ferrari M.
        Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 355-360
        • Miyasaka K.
        • Nakabayashi N.
        Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin.
        Dent Mater. 1999; 15: 153-157
        • Kenshima S.
        • Francci C.
        • Reis A.
        • et al.
        Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer.
        J Dent. 2006; 34: 775-783
        • Serafino C.
        • Gallina G.
        • Cumbo E.
        • et al.
        Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 381-387
        • de Souza F.D.
        • Pecora J.D.
        • Silva R.G.
        The effect on coronal leakage of liquid adhesive application over root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99: 125-128
        • Goracci C.
        • Sadek F.T.
        • Fabianelli A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin.
        Oper Dent. 2005; 30: 627-635
        • Sattabanasuk V.
        • Vachiramon V.
        • Qian F.
        • et al.
        Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods.
        J Dent. 2007; 35: 467-475
        • Yang B.
        • Adelung R.
        • Ludwig K.
        • et al.
        Effect of structural change of collagen fibrils on the durability of dentin bonding.
        Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 5021-5031
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Khademi A.A.
        • Babagoli J.
        • et al.
        A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 170-175
        • Lui J.N.
        • Kuah H.G.
        • Chen N.N.
        Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 472-475
        • Chopra S.
        • Murray P.E.
        • Namerow K.N.
        A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1243-1245
        • Carvalho A.S.
        • Camargo C.H.
        • Valera M.C.
        • et al.
        Smear layer removal by auxiliary chemical substances in biomechanical preparation: a scanning electron microscope study.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1396-1400
        • Marending M.
        • Paque F.
        • Fischer J.
        • et al.
        Impact of irrigant sequence on mechanical properties of human root dentin.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1325-1328
        • Coniglio I.
        • Magni E.
        • Goracci C.
        • et al.
        Post space cleaning using a new nickel titanium endodontic drill combined with different cleaning regimens.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 83-86
        • Serafino C.
        • Gallina G.
        • Cumbo E.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound effects after post space preparation: an SEM study.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 549-552
        • Van Meerbeek B.
        • De Munck J.
        • Yoshida Y.
        • et al.
        Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.
        Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 215-235
        • Boone K.J.
        • Murchison D.F.
        • Schindler W.G.
        • et al.
        Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers.
        J Endod. 2001; 27: 768-771
        • Calt S.
        • Serper A.
        Smear layer removal by EGTA.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 459-461
        • O'Connell M.S.
        • Morgan L.A.
        • Beeler W.J.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 739-743
        • Guerisoli D.M.
        • Marchesan M.A.
        • Walmsley A.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation.
        Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 418-421
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Cho Y.
        • Khademi A.A.
        • et al.
        The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 233-239
        • Saito K.
        • Webb T.D.
        • Imamura G.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of shortened irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1011-1014
        • Calt S.
        • Serper A.
        Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 17-19
        • da Silva L.A.
        • Sanguino A.C.
        • Rocha C.T.
        • et al.
        Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1541-1544
        • Tasman F.
        • Cehreli Z.C.
        • Ogan C.
        • et al.
        Surface tension of root canal irrigants.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 586-587
        • Pecora J.D.
        • Guimaraes L.F.
        • Savioli R.N.
        Surface tension of several drugs used in endodontics.
        Braz Dent J. 1992; 2: 123-127
        • Cameron J.A.
        The effect of a fluorocarbon surfactant on the surface tension of the endodontic irrigant, sodium hypochlorite. A preliminary report.
        Aust Dent J. 1986; 31: 364-368
        • Hülsmann M.
        • Heckendorff M.
        • Lennon A.
        Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 810-830
        • Gutarts R.
        • Nusstein J.
        • Reader A.
        • et al.
        In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
        J Endod. 2005; 31: 166-170