Advertisement
Basic Research| Volume 36, ISSUE 2, P302-304, February 2010

An In Vitro Comparison of Profile GT and GTX Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Apical Transportation and Length Control in Mandibular Molar

Published:December 11, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.021

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Profile GT files have been redesigned and are now marketed as GTX nickel-titanium rotary files.

      Methods

      A double-digital radiographic technique was used to compare apical transportation (AT) and change in working length (CWL) between Profile GT and GTX rotary files. Mesiobuccal canals of 40 extracted mandibular molars were instrumented by either rotary system. The central axes of preoperative (15 K) and master apical rotary file (30/.04) were digitally superimposed. AutoCAD was used to measure AT at 0, 1, and 3 mm from WL. The distance from the file tip to the set WL indicated any CWL. Analysis of variance test showed no significant differences between groups in AT.

      Results

      CWL in GTX (−0.25 ± 0.42) group was significantly greater than in Profile GT group (0.17 ± 0.30).

      Conclusions

      The AT results indicate that the newly designed GTX rotary instruments are as effective as the older Profile GT instruments.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Pettiette M.T.
        • Delano E.O.
        • Trope M.
        Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium handvfiles.
        J Endod. 2001; 27: 124-127
        • Gorni F.G.
        • Gagliani M.M.
        The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 1-4
        • Kum K.Y.
        • Spangberg L.
        • Cha B.Y.
        • et al.
        Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 719-723
        • Loizides A.L.
        • Kakavetsos V.D.
        • Tzanetakis G.N.
        • Kontakiotis E.G.
        • Eliades G.
        A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1455-1459
        • Matwychuk M.J.
        • Bowles W.R.
        • McClanahan S.B.
        • Hodges J.S.
        • Pesun I.J.
        Shaping abilities of two different engine-driven rotary nickel titanium systems or stainless steel balanced-force technique in mandibular molars.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 868-871
        • Chen J.L.
        • Messer H.H.
        A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
        Aust Dent J. 2002; 47: 12-20
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Firic S.
        • Tulcan J.
        • Karabucak B.
        • Kim S.
        Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
        Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 359-364
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Maggiore F.
        • Suh B.
        • Edwards K.R.
        • Kang J.
        • Kim S.
        Comparison of apical transportation in four Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation techniques.
        J Endod. 2003; 29: 587-591
      1. Buchanan S. The technique for GT Series X rotary shaping files. 2009 Available from: www.endobuchanan.com.

        • Gambarini G.
        • Grande N.M.
        • Plotino G.
        • et al.
        Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1003-1005