This study was conducted to investigate cyclic flexural fatigue resistance of GT series X rotary files made from the newly developed M-wire nickel-titanium alloy compared with GT and Profile nickel-titanium files made from a conventional nickel-titanium alloy.
Fifteen files, size 30/0.04, of each type were used to evaluate the cyclic flexural fatigue resistance. A simple device was specifically constructed to measure the time each file type required to fail under cyclic flexural fatigue testing.
The results of this experiment indicated that the GT series X files had superior cyclic flexural fatigue resistance than the other 2 file types made from a conventional nickel-titanium alloy (P = .004). On the other hand, the difference between the Profile and the GT files was not statistically significant.
The findings of this study suggest that size 30/0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files made from the newly developed M-wire alloy have better cyclic flexural fatigue resistance than files of similar design and size made from the conventional nickel-titanium alloy.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Cleaning and shaping the root canal.Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18: 269-296
- The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape.J Endod. 1975; 1: 255-262
- Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments after clinical use.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 251-256
- A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.J Endod. 1995; 21: 146-151
- A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.J Endod. 1997; 23: 503-507
- Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation.J Endod. 2006; 32: 1139-1141
- A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study.J Endod. 2006; 32: 1048-1052
- Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.J Endod. 1997; 23: 77-85
- Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems.Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 755-763
- Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.J Endod. 1999; 25: 434-440
- Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests.J Endod. 2002; 28: 448-451
- Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use.J Endod. 2004; 30: 722-725
- Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.J Endod. 2008; 34: 1003-1005
- Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments.J Endod. 2008; 34: 1406-1409
- Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments.J Endod. 2009; 35: 401-403
- A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275
- Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument: part 1—strain-life relationship.Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 612-618
© 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.