Advertisement

Microtomography-based Comparison of Reciprocating Single-File F2 ProTaper Technique versus Rotary Full Sequence

Published:August 08, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.031

      Abstract

      Introduction

      A preparation technique with only 1 single instrument was proposed on the basis of the reciprocating movement of the F2 ProTaper instrument. The present study was designed to quantitatively assess canal preparation outcomes achieved by this technique.

      Methods

      Twenty-five extracted human mandibular first molars with 2 separate mesial root canals were selected. Canals were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 experimental groups: group 1, rotary conventional preparation by using ProTaper, and group 2, reciprocate instrumentation with 1 single ProTaper F2 instrument. Specimens were scanned initially and after root canal preparation with an isotropic resolution of 20 μm by using a micro–computed tomography system. The following parameters were assessed: changes in dentin volume, percentage of shaped canal walls, and degree of canal transportation. In addition, the time required to reach working length with the F2 instrument was recorded.

      Results

      Preoperatively, there were no differences regarding root canal curvature and volume between experimental groups. Overall, instrumentation led to enlarged canal shapes with no evidence of preparation errors. There were no statistical differences between the 2 preparation techniques in the anatomical parameters assessed (P > .01), except for a significantly higher canal transportation caused by the reciprocating file in the coronal canal third. On the other hand, preparation was faster by using the single-file technique (P < .01).

      Conclusions

      Shaping outcomes with the single-file F2 ProTaper technique and conventional ProTaper full-sequence rotary approach were similar. However, the single-file F2 ProTaper technique was markedly faster in reaching working length.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peters O.
        Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 559-567
        • Scully C.
        • Smith A.
        • Bagg J.
        Prions and the human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2003; 47: 493-516
        • Pruett J.
        • Clement D.
        • Carnes D.J.
        Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
        J Endod. 1997; 23: 77-85
        • Yared G.
        Canal preparation using only one ni-ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 339-344
        • De-Deus G.
        • Moreira E.
        • Lopes H.
        • Elias C.N.
        Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 Protaper instruments used in reciprocating movement.
        Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 1063-1068
        • De-Deus G.
        • Brandao M.
        • Barino B.
        • Di Giorgi K.
        • Fidel R.
        • Luna A.
        Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file Protaper f2 technique under reciprocating movement.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: 390-394
        • De-Deus G.
        • Barino B.
        • Zamolyi R.
        • et al.
        Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 Protaper technique in oval-shaped canals.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1897-1900
        • Schneider S.
        A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275
        • Paqué F.
        • Laib A.
        • Gautschi H.
        • Zehnder M.
        Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1044-1047
        • Paqué F.
        • Ganahl D.
        • Peters O.
        Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1056-1059
        • You S.
        • Bae K.
        • Baek S.H.
        • Kum K.
        • Shon W.J.
        • Lee W.
        Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1991-1994
        • Schilder H.
        Cleaning and shaping the root canal.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18: 269-296
        • Zehnder M.
        Root canal irrigants.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 389-398