Advertisement
Basic Research| Volume 40, ISSUE 5, P717-720, May 2014

Influence of Single-file Endodontics on Apical Transportation in Curved Root Canals: An Ex Vivo Micro–Computed Tomographic Study

Published:October 29, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.021

      Abstract

      Introduction

      More information regarding the ability of single files to maintain the original canal position is required before adopting a single-file approach to cleaning and shaping. This study compares apical transportation in curved root canals when instrumenting with a single WaveOne (WO) file (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) in a reciprocating motion with that incurred when using a sequence of Twisted Files (TFs; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) in a continuous rotating motion.

      Methods

      Forty mesial canals of mandibular molars were evenly allocated into 2 balanced groups (n = 20) with a 17-mm average canal length and 20° average curvature. Canals were accessed in a conventional manner and instrumentation was completed with a single WO file or a series of TFs. The canals were instrumented according to the manufacturers' protocol. Apical transportation was assessed on a comparison of the pre- and postinstrumentation micro–computed tomographic scans at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-mm sections. One-way analysis of variance was performed to assess if a significant difference between systems exists.

      Results

      No significant difference (P > .05) was found between the WO and TF groups. Transportation in the mesial direction was of greater magnitude than distal transportation for both files systems. The mean transportation in the mesial direction was 100.1 ± 8.8 μm (WO group) and 101.0 ± 10.9 μm (TF group) (P = .5), whereas distal transportation was found to be 80.9 ± 14.6 μm (WO group) and 60.3 ± 11.0 μm (TF group) (P = .3).

      Conclusions

      The results suggest that no difference exists between the WO file system and the conventional multifile TF system when considering apical transportation in curved canals.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Loizides A.L.
        • Kakavetsos V.D.
        • Tzanetakis G.N.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1455-1459
        • Gonzalez-Rodrıguez M.P.
        • Ferrer-Luque C.M.
        A comparison of ProFile, Hero 642, and K3 instrumentation systems in teeth using digital imaging analysis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 112-115
        • Franco V.
        • Fabiani C.
        • Taschieri S.
        • et al.
        Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1398-1401
        • You S.Y.
        • Kim H.C.
        • Bae K.S.
        • et al.
        Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1296-1300
        • Freire L.G.
        • Gavini G.
        • Barletta F.B.
        • et al.
        Microscopic computerized tomographic evaluation of root canal transportation prepared with twisted or ground nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112: 143-148
        • Gambarini G.
        • Gerosa R.
        • de Luca M.
        • et al.
        Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 798-800
        • Kim H.C.
        • Yum J.
        • Hur B.
        • et al.
        Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 147-152
        • Gergi R.
        • Rjeily J.A.
        • Sader J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 904-907
        • Gambarini G.
        • Grande N.M.
        • Plotino G.
        • et al.
        Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1003-1005
        • Gambarini G.
        • Plotino G.
        • Grande N.M.
        • et al.
        Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique.
        Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 337-341
        • Johnson E.
        • Lloyd A.
        • Kuttler S.
        • et al.
        Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 1406-1409
        • Plotino G.
        • Grande N.M.
        • Testarelli L.
        • et al.
        Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments.
        Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 614-618
        • Kim H.C.
        • Hwang Y.J.
        • Jung D.W.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion.
        Scanning. 2013; 35: 112-118
        • Berutti E.
        • Chiandussi G.
        • Paolino D.S.
        • et al.
        Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 505-509
        • You S.Y.
        • Bae K.S.
        • Baek S.H.
        • et al.
        Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1991-1994
        • De-Deus G.
        • Moreira E.J.
        • Lopes H.P.
        • et al.
        Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement.
        Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 1063-1068
        • Gambarini G.
        The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system.
        Endod Top. 2005; 10: 179-182
        • Zhao D.
        • Shen Y.
        • Peng B.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 385-388
        • Schneider S.W.
        A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1971; 32: 271-275
        • Yared G.
        Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 339-344
        • Varela-Patino P.
        • Ibanez-Parraga A.
        • Rivas-Mundina B.
        • et al.
        Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 157-159
        • Duran-Sindreu F.
        • García M.
        • Olivieri J.G.
        • et al.
        A comparison of apical transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 993-995
        • García M.
        • Duran-Sindreu F.
        • Mercadé M.
        • et al.
        A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 990-992
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Kwon T.K.
        • Karabucak B.
        Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1226-1229
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Firic S.
        • Tulcan J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
        Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 359-364
        • Wu M.K.
        • Fan B.
        • Wesselink P.R.
        Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals: part I—effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings.
        J Endod. 2000; 26: 210-216
        • Gutmann J.L.
        • Gao Y.
        Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review.
        Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 113-128
        • Shen Y.
        • Zhou H.M.
        • Zheng Y.F.
        • et al.
        Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1566-1571
        • Bürklein S.
        • Schäfer E.
        Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 850-852
        • Iqbal M.K.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • Kim J.S.
        A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 1048-1052