Advertisement

An Analysis of the Proximity of Maxillary Posterior Teeth to the Maxillary Sinus Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Published:December 19, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.017

      Abstract

      Introduction

      It is known that the level of the maxillary sinus floor varies with age. Because few studies have investigated whether the position of the posterior roots relative to the maxillary sinus varied with the variation of the sinus floor or not, the present study assessed the position according to age.

      Methods

      Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 848 patients were reconstructed to evaluate the position of the posterior roots relative to the sinus floor, which were divided into 3 types, and quantify the distances between posterior root apexes and the adjacent border of the sinus floor. Measurements were taken for each root, and data were correlated with age, which was divided into 4 groups (≤20 years, 21–40 years, 41–60 years, and >60 years).

      Results

      A total of 3063 premolars and 3095 molars were evaluated. The mean distances from the root tips to the border of the maxillary sinus floor increased with increasing age. From the first and second premolar roots, the mean distances ranged from 3.6 ± 4.1 mm to 8.9 ± 4.6 mm and from 0.7 ± 3.3 mm to 5.3 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. From the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatinal roots of the first molars, the mean distances were −0.4 ± 2.8 mm to 4.6 ± 4.0 mm, −0.3 ± 2.4 mm to 4.4 ± 3.8 mm, and −0.4 ± 3.5 mm to 3.9 ± 4.1 mm, respectively. From the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatinal roots of the second molars, the mean distances were −0.5 ± 2.2 mm to 3.4 ± 3.5 mm, 0.3 ± 2.2 mm to 3.9 ± 3.7 mm, and 1.1 ± 3.2 mm to 4.6 ± 4.5 mm, respectively. The frequency of type IS decreased with increasing age. It was very low in first premolars (0%–8.13%) and higher in second premolars (0%–25.68%), first molars (0%–44.75%), and second molars (0%–32.89%). Age significantly influenced the mean distances to the sinus floor and the frequencies of type IS (inside).

      Conclusions

      Cone-beam computed tomographic imaging is an effective method to study the position of the posterior roots to the maxillary sinus floor. Variation in proximity measurements was found by age, with those under the age of 40 showing a greater likelihood of the position of maxillary roots above/inside the sinus floor.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lu Y.
        • Liu Z.
        • Zhang L.
        • et al.
        Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 1069-1074
        • Nurbakhsh B.
        • Friedman S.
        • Kulkarni G.V.
        • et al.
        Resolution of maxillary sinus mucositis after endodontic treatment of maxillary teeth with apical periodontitis: a cone-beam computed tomography pilot study.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1504-1511
        • Hauman C.H.
        • Chandler N.P.
        • Tong D.C.
        Endodontic implications of the maxillary sinus: a review.
        Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 127-141
        • Harrison D.F.
        Oro-antral fistula.
        Br J Clin Pract. 1961; 15: 169-174
        • Selden H.S.
        Endo-antral syndrome and various endodontic complications.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 389-392
        • Ioannides C.
        • Borstlap W.A.
        Apicoectomy on molars: a clinical and radiographical study.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1983; 12: 73-79
        • Persson G.
        Periapical surgery of molars.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1982; 11: 96-100
        • Watzek G.
        • Bernhart T.
        • Ulm C.
        Complications of sinus perforations and their management in endodontics.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41: 563-583
        • Wehrbein H.
        • Diedrich P.
        Progressive pneumatization of the basal maxillary sinus after extraction and space closure.
        Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992; 53 ([in German]): 77-83
        • Sharan A.
        • Madjar D.
        Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 48-56
        • Sharan A.
        • Madjar D.
        Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 375-381
        • Jun B.C.
        • Song S.W.
        • Park C.S.
        • et al.
        The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132: 429-434
        • Louie A.F.
        Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy for Oral Implantology.
        1st ed. Hanover, Germany: Quintessence Publishing, 2013: 14-264
        • Howe R.B.
        First molar radicular bone near maxillary sinus: a comparison of CBCT analysis and gross anatomic dissection for small bony measurement.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 264-269
        • Kilic C.
        • Kamburoglu K.
        • Yuksel S.P.
        • et al.
        An assessment of the relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and the maxillary posterior teeth root tips using dental cone-beam computerized tomography.
        Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 462-467
        • Georgescu C.E.
        • Rusu M.C.
        • Sandulescu M.
        • et al.
        Quantitative and qualitative bone analysis in the maxillary lateral region.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2012; 34: 551-558
        • Jung Y.H.
        • Cho B.H.
        Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography.
        Imaging Sci Dent. 2012; 42: 219-224
        • Von Arx T.
        • Fodich I.
        • Bornstein M.M.
        Proximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: a radiographic survey using cone-beam computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 1541-1548
        • Eberhardt J.A.
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Christiansen E.L.
        A computed tomographic study of the distances between the maxillary sinus floor and the apices of the maxillary posterior teeth.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992; 73: 345-346
        • Kwak H.H.
        • Park H.D.
        • Kang M.K.
        • et al.
        Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 33: 382-388
        • Ok E.
        • Gungor E.
        • Colak M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the sinus floor using cone–beam computed tomography.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36: 907-914
        • Pajin O.
        • Centurion B.S.
        • Rubira-Bullen I.R.
        • et al.
        Maxillary sinus and posterior teeth: accessing close relationship by cone-beam computed tomographic scanning in a Brazilian population.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 748-751
        • Neelakantan P.
        • Subbarao C.
        • Ahuja R.
        • et al.
        Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1622-1627
        • Silva E.J.
        • Nejaim Y.
        • Silva A.I.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 173-176