Advertisement

Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of 2 Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Shaping Root Canals

Published:January 08, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.007

      Highlights

      • Analysis of the micro–computed tomographic scans revealed no procedural errors during root canal shaping.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Cleaning and shaping without making procedural errors have always been a challenge in endodontics, particularly when the root canals are curved. Several rotary instruments have been developed to minimize such errors. The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of 2 rotary file systems, BioRace (BR; FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) and ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), during the preparation of curved root canals in extracted teeth using micro–computed tomographic imaging.

      Methods

      A total of 20 first and second human mandibular molars with 2 separate mesial canals were scanned before and after root canal preparations using the SkyScan 1176 X-ray microtomograph (Bruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium) at a resolution of 17.42 μm. Canals were prepared using the BR and PTN systems. The percentage of dentin removed after preparation, root canal volume increase, untreated canal walls, structure model index, degree of canal transportation, and centering ability were also measured.

      Results

      There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the removed dentin after preparation and determination of the root canal volume, percentage of untreated canal walls, structure model index, degree of canal transportation, and centering ability (P > .05).

      Conclusions

      In conclusion, within the limitations of this ex vivo study, instrumentation of moderately curved mesial roots with 2 independent root canals and foramina using the BR and PTN rotary file systems were equally effective. Both instrumentation systems caused negligible procedural errors with minimal apical transportation.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zhao D.
        • Shen Y.
        • Peng B.
        • et al.
        Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 1860-1864
        • Elnaghy A.M.
        • Elsaka S.E.
        Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 2053-2056
        • Bürklein S.
        • Mathey D.
        • Schäfer E.
        Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 774-781
        • Lopes H.P.
        • Elias C.N.
        • Vieira V.T.
        • et al.
        Effects of electropolishing surface treatment on the cyclic fatigue resistance of BioRace nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1653-1657
        • Peters O.A.
        • Peters C.I.
        • Schonenberger K.
        • et al.
        ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT.
        Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 86-92
        • Zhao D.
        • Shen Y.
        • Peng B.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 385-388
        • Versiani M.A.
        • Leoni G.B.
        • Steier L.
        • et al.
        Micro–computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the Self-Adjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 1060-1066
        • Schneider S.W.
        A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275
        • Freire L.G.
        • Iglecias E.F.
        • Cunha R.S.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of hard tissue debris removal after different irrigation methods and its influence on the filling of curved canals.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 1660-1666
        • Capar I.D.
        • Ertas H.
        • Ok E.
        • et al.
        Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 852-856
        • Paqué F.
        • Ganahl D.
        • Peters O.A.
        Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1056-1059
        • Gambill J.M.
        • Alder M.
        • del Rio C.E.
        Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.
        J Endod. 1996; 22: 369-375
        • Paqué F.
        • Laib A.
        • Gautschi H.
        • et al.
        Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1044-1047
        • Gergi R.
        • Arbab-Chirani R.A.
        • Osta N.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 1223-1227
        • You S.Y.
        • Kim H.C.
        • Bae K.S.
        • et al.
        Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1296-1300
        • Moore J.
        • Fitz-Walter P.
        • Parashos P.
        A micro-computed tomography evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 1057-1064
        • Azim A.A.
        • Griggs J.A.
        • Huang G.T.
        The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment.
        Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 6-16
        • Peter O.A.
        • Laib A.
        • Göhring T.N.
        • et al.
        Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2001; 27: 1-6
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Kwon T.K.
        • Karabucak B.
        Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1226-1229
        • Berutti E.
        • Fedon G.
        Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars.
        J Endod. 1992; 18: 545-548
        • Peters O.A.
        • Paque F.
        Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 53-57
        • Pasqualini D.
        • Alovisi M.
        • Cemenasco A.
        • et al.
        Micro-computed tomography evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRace shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 1706-1710
        • Gergi R.
        • Osta N.
        • Bourbouze G.
        • et al.
        Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 162-170
        • Alapati S.B.
        • Brantley W.A.
        • Iijma M.
        • et al.
        Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1589-1593
        • Elnaghy A.M.
        • Elsaka S.E.
        Assessment of the mechanical properties of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 1830-1834
        • Honardar K.
        • Assadian H.
        • Shahab S.
        • et al.
        Cone-beam tomographic assessment of canal centering ability and transportation after preparation with Twisted File and Bio Race instrumentation.
        J Dent. 2014; 11: 440-446
        • Freire L.G.
        • Gavini G.
        • Branco-Barletta F.
        • et al.
        Microscopic computerized tomographic evaluation of root canal transportation prepared with twisted or ground nickel-titanium Rotary instruments.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112: 43-48
        • Saber S.E.
        • Nagy M.M.
        • Schäfer E.
        Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRace and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 131-136
        • Wu M.K.
        • R'oris A.
        • Barkis D.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 89: 739-743
        • Busquim S.
        • Cunha R.S.
        • Freire L.
        • et al.
        A micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using reciprocating or rotary systems.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 1001-1006
        • Gagliardi J.
        • Versiani M.A.
        • Sousa-Neto M.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 1718-1724
        • Paqué F.
        • Zehnder M.
        • DeDeus G.
        Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1394-1397