Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial



      The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the influence of rotary or reciprocating retreatment techniques on the incidence, intensity, duration of postoperative pain, and medication intake.


      After power analysis calculations, 65 patients who needed endodontic retreatment were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to the instrumentation system used: Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) or Reciproc (VDW). Retreatments were performed in a single visit by an endodontic specialist. Participants were asked to rate the incidence and intensity of the postoperative pain on a verbal rating scale 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment. Patients were also asked to record the number of prescribed analgesic medication tablets (ibuprofen 400 mg) taken. A logistic regression analysis was used to assess both the incidence and duration of pain. Differences in the intensity of pain were analyzed using the ordinal (linear) chi-square test, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences in the intake of analgesic medication between groups.


      No statistically significant difference was found among the 2 groups in relation to postoperative pain or analgesic medication intake at the 3 time points assessed (P > .05). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of pain after 24 hours when preoperative pain was present and a significantly longer duration of pain for men than women independently of the retreatment technique used.


      The reciprocating system and the continuous rotary system were found to be equivalent regarding the incidence, intensity, duration of postoperative pain, and intake of analgesic medication.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Seltzer S.
        • Naidorf I.J.
        Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors.
        J Endod. 1985; 11: 472-478
        • Seltzer S.
        • Naidorf I.J.
        Flare-ups in endodontics: II. Therapeutic measures.
        J Endod. 1985; 11: 559-567
        • Siqueira Jr., J.F.
        • Rôças I.N.
        • Favieri A.
        • et al.
        Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 457-460
        • Arias A.
        • de la Macorra J.C.
        • Hidalgo J.J.
        • Azabal M.
        Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study.
        Int Endod J. 2013; 46: 784-793
        • Alves Vde O.
        Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: e68-e72
        • Trope M.
        Flare-up rate of single visit endodontics.
        Int Endod J. 1991; 24: 24-26
        • Imura N.
        • Zuolo M.L.
        Factors associated with endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study.
        Int Endod J. 1995; 28: 261-265
        • Mattscheck D.J.
        • Law A.S.
        • Noblett W.C.
        Retreatment versus initial root canal treatment: factors affecting posttreatment pain.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92: 321-324
        • Rodrigues E.
        • De-Deus G.
        • Souza E.
        • Silva E.J.
        Safe mechanical preparation with reicprocation movement without glide path creation: result from a pool of 673 root canals.
        Braz Dent J. 2016; 27: 22-27
        • De-Deus G.
        • Arruda T.E.
        • Souza E.M.
        • et al.
        The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path.
        Int Endod J. 2013; 46: 993-998
        • Nevares G.
        • de Albuquerque D.S.
        • Freire L.G.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of ProTaper Next compared with Reciproc in removing obturation material from severely curved root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 803-808
        • Zuolo A.S.
        • Zuolo M.L.
        • Bueno C.E.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc file systems in the removal of root filling material: an ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 315-319
        • Rödig T.
        • Reicherts P.
        • Konietschke F.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments for retreatment of curved root canals assessed by micro-CT.
        Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 942-948
        • Silva E.J.
        • Sá L.
        • Belladonna F.G.
        • et al.
        Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 2077-2080
        • Dincer A.N.
        • Er O.
        • Canakci B.C.
        Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 1194-1198
        • Uzunoglu E.
        • Turker S.A.
        Impact of different file systems on the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment.
        Eur J Dent. 2016; 10: 210-214
        • Çanakçi B.C.
        • Ustun Y.
        • Er O.
        • Genc Sen O.
        Evaluation of apically extruded debris from curved root canal filling removal using 5 nickel-titanium systems.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1101-1104
        • Relvas J.B.
        • Bastos M.M.
        • Marques A.A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 1987-1993
        • Orstavik D.
        • Kereks K.
        • Eriksen H.M.
        The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986; 2: 20-34
        • Nekoofar M.H.
        • Sheykhrezae M.S.
        • Meraji N.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 575-578
        • Neelakantan P.
        • Sharma S.
        Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics–a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19: 2211-2217
        • Shokraneh A.
        • Ajami M.
        • Farhadi N.
        • et al.
        Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 413-418
        • Kherlakian D.
        • Cunha R.S.
        • Ehrhardt I.C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using 2 reciprocating systems and a continuous rotary system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 171-176
        • Figini L.
        • Lodi G.
        • Gorni F.
        • Gagliani M.
        Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 17: CD005296
        • Ferreira-Valente M.A.
        • Pais-Ribeiro J.L.
        • Jensen M.P.
        Validity of four pain intensity rating scales.
        Pain. 2011; 152: 2399-2404
        • Keiser K.
        • Byrne B.E.
        Endodontic pharmacology.
        in: Hargreaves K.M. Cohen S. Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. Mosby Elsevier, St Louis2011: 671-690
        • Yesilsoy C.
        • Koren L.Z.
        • Morse D.R.
        • et al.
        Post-endodontic obturation pain: a comparative evaluation.
        Quintessence Int. 1988; 19: 431-438
        • Spångberg L.S.
        Evidence-based endodontics: the one-visit treatment idea.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91: 617-618
        • Lin L.M.
        • Lin J.
        • Rosenberg P.A.
        One-appointment endodontic therapy: biological considerations.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138: 1456-1462
        • Paredes-Vieyra J.
        • Enriquez F.J.
        Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 1164-1169
        • de Chevigny C.
        • Dao T.T.
        • Basrani B.R.
        • et al.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study – phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 131-137
        • Eyuboglu T.F.
        • Olcay K.
        • Özcan M.
        A clinical study on single-visit root canal retreatments on consecutive 173 patients: frequency of periapical complications and clinical success rate.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 1761-1768
        • Sathorn C.
        • Parashos P.
        • Messer H.
        The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 91-99
        • Yoldas O.
        • Topuz A.
        • Isçi A.S.
        • Oztunc H.
        Postoperative pain after endodontic retreatment: single- versus two-visit treatment.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98: 483-487