Advertisement

Survival Rates from Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Full-coverage Crowns or Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Retrospective Study

Published:December 02, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.013

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The aim of the present study was to compare the survival rates against fracture of premolar endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with resin composite or crowns and to identify risk factors associated with the fracture.

      Methods

      Data from dental records and radiographs of premolar ETT with postendodontic restorations (ie, resin composite or crowns) were collected between 2012 and 2016 and selected following selected inclusion and exclusion criteria. Tooth location, type of restoration, number of proximal contacts, and amount of tooth surface loss were recorded. The incidence and restorability of postendodontic fractures were identified. Survival rates against fracture of the 2 restoration types were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Any potential factors associated with fractures were identified using Cox proportional hazards models.

      Results

      The survival rate against fracture of ETT restored with crowns (95.1%) was higher than resin composite (77.0%). ETT restored with resin composite with 1 or 2 tooth surface losses and 2 proximal contacts had a high survival rate of 88.5% that was not significantly different from ETT with crowns. A higher incidence of restorability after fracture was observed in teeth restored with resin composite than crowns. The type of restoration and number of proximal contacts were identified as potential risk factors associated with fracture incidence.

      Conclusions

      The survival rate against fracture of ETT restored with crowns was higher than resin composite. However, ETT with 1 or 2 tooth surface losses and 2 proximal contacts and restored with resin composite showed a high survival rate that was comparable with ETT restored with crowns.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Panitvisai P.
        • Messer H.H.
        Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures.
        J Endod. 1995; 21: 57-61
        • Reeh E.S.
        • Douglas W.H.
        • Messer H.H.
        Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique.
        J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1540-1544
        • Fuss Z.
        • Lustig J.
        • Tamse A.
        Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth.
        Int Endod J. 1999; 32: 283-286
        • Vire D.E.
        Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation.
        J Endod. 1991; 17: 338-342
        • Safavi K.E.
        • Dowden W.E.
        • Langeland K.
        Influence of delayed coronal permanent restoration on endodontic prognosis.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987; 3: 187-191
        • Uranga A.
        • Blum J.Y.
        • Esber S.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of four coronal obturation materials in endodontic treatment.
        J Endod. 1999; 25: 178-180
        • American Association for Endodontists
        Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: the endodontist's perspective: part I.
        2004 (Available at: http://www.aae.org/uploadedfiles/publications_and_research/endodontics_colleagues_for_excellence_newsletter/ss04ecfeforweb.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2017)
        • Sorensen J.A.
        • Martinoff J.T.
        Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 780-784
        • Nagasiri R.
        • Chitmongkolsuk S.
        Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 164-170
        • Aquilino S.A.
        • Caplan D.J.
        Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 256-263
        • Xie K.X.
        • Wang X.Y.
        • Gao X.J.
        • et al.
        Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
        Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 524-529
        • Mincik J.
        • Urban D.
        • Timkova S.
        • Urban R.
        Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by various direct filling materials: an in vitro study.
        Int J Biomater. 2016; 2016: 9138945
        • Mannocci F.
        • Bertelli E.
        • Sherriff M.
        • et al.
        Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 297-301
        • Dammaschke T.
        • Nykiel K.
        • Sagheri D.
        • Schafer E.
        Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
        Aust Endod J. 2013; 39: 48-56
        • Dietschi D.
        • Bouillaguet S.
        • Sadan A.
        Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth.
        in: Dietschi D. Bouillaguet S. Sadan A. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. 2011: 777-807
        • Bursac Z.
        • Gauss C.H.
        • Williams D.K.
        • Hosmer D.W.
        Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.
        Source Code Biol Med. 2008; 3: 17
        • Caplan D.J.
        • Weintraub J.A.
        Factors related to loss of root canal filled teeth.
        J Public Health Dent. 1997; 57: 31-39
        • Reeh E.S.
        • Messer H.H.
        • Douglas W.H.
        Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures.
        J Endod. 1989; 15: 512-516
        • Ng Y.L.
        • Mann V.
        • Gulabivala K.
        A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival.
        Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 610-625
        • De Munck J.
        • Van Landuyt K.
        • Peumans M.
        • et al.
        A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.
        J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-132
        • Chan C.P.
        • Lin C.P.
        • Tseng S.C.
        • Jeng J.H.
        Vertical root fracture in endodontically versus nonendodontically treated teeth: a survey of 315 cases in Chinese patients.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87: 504-507
        • Tamse A.
        Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: diagnostic signs and clinical management.
        Endod Topics. 2006; 13: 84-94
        • Chan C.P.
        • Tseng S.C.
        • Lin C.P.
        • et al.
        Vertical root fracture in nonendodontically treated teeth–a clinical report of 64 cases in Chinese patients.
        J Endod. 1998; 24: 678-681
        • Yang S.F.
        • Rivera E.M.
        • Walton R.E.
        Vertical root fracture in nonendodontically treated teeth.
        J Endod. 1995; 21: 337-339