Influence of Hemostatic Agents in the Prognosis of Periapical Surgery: A Randomized Study of Epinephrine versus Aluminum Chloride



      Several variables have been associated with a better prognosis of periapical surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 hemostatic agents on the prognosis of periapical surgery at 12 months.


      A prospective study was designed with 2 randomized parallel groups established depending on the hemostatic agent used: epinephrine or aluminum chloride. The analysis of the hemorrhage control was recorded as 0 (no hemorrhage control), 1 (slight but apparent intermittent bleeding persisted after application of the material), or 2 (complete hemorrhage control). At 12 months, periapical lesion healing was determined clinically and radiologically as success, improvement, or failure.


      Ninety-five patients (67 women and 28 men) with periapical lesions involving a single tooth were enrolled in this study; in 45 teeth, epinephrine was used and in 50 teeth aluminum chloride. In the epinephrine group, 28 teeth were classified as successes, 10 as improvements, and 7 as failures. In the aluminum chloride group, 34 teeth were classified as successes, 11 as improvements, and 5 as failures. No statistically significant difference was found.


      The present study found no association between the use of epinephrine or aluminum chloride as hemostatic agents on the prognosis of periapical surgery. The efficacy of hemostatic agents at the time of surgery showed no relationship with the healing outcome.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


        • Rahbaran S.
        • Gilthorpe M.S.
        • Harrison S.D.
        • Gulabivala K.
        Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a retrospective study.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91: 700-709
        • von Arx T.
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Hänni S.
        Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing outcome 1 year after periapical surgery.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 123-128
        • Kreisler M.
        • Gockel R.
        • Aubell-Falkenberg S.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcome in periradicular surgery: effect of patient- and tooth-related factors–a multicenter study.
        Quintessence Int. 2013; 44: 53-60
        • Wang N.
        • Knight K.
        • Dao T.
        • Friedman S.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics-the Toronto study. Phases I and II: apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 751-761
        • Barone C.
        • Dao T.T.
        • Basrani B.B.
        • et al.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study–phases 3, 4, and 5: apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 28-35
        • Peñarrocha M.
        • Martí E.
        • García B.
        • Gay C.
        Relationship of periapical lesion radiologic size, apical resection, and retrograde filling with the prognosis of periapical surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 1526-1529
        • Wang Q.
        • Cheung G.S.
        • Ng R.P.
        Survival of surgical endodontic treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital: a cohort study.
        Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 764-775
        • Gagliani M.M.
        • Gorni F.G.
        • Strohmenger L.
        Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: a 5-year longitudinal comparison.
        Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 320-327
        • Bader G.
        • Lejeune S.
        Prospective study of two retrograde endodontic apical preparations with and without the use of CO2 laser.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998; 14: 75-78
        • Testori T.
        • Capelli M.
        • Milani S.
        • Weinstein R.L.
        Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87: 493-498
        • Tsesis I.
        • Rosen E.
        • Schwartz-Arad D.
        • Fuss Z.
        Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique.
        J Endod. 2006; 32: 412-416
        • von Arx T.
        • Peñarrocha M.
        • Jensen S.
        Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 957-973
        • von Arx T.
        • Jensen S.S.
        • Hänni S.
        • Friedman S.
        Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 570-579
        • von Arx T.
        • Hänni S.
        • Jensen S.S.
        Clinical results with two different methods of root-end preparation and filling in apical surgery: mineral trioxide aggregate and adhesive resin composite.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1122-1129
        • Peñarrocha-Diago M.
        • Maestre-Ferrín L.
        • Peñarrocha-Oltra D.
        • et al.
        Influence of hemostatic agents upon the outcome of periapical surgery: dressings with anesthetic and vasoconstrictor or aluminum chloride.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18: e272-e278
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Moher D.
        CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2010; 340: c332
        • Menéndez-Nieto I.
        • Cervera-Ballester J.
        • Maestre-Ferrín L.
        • et al.
        Hemostatic agents in periapical surgery: a randomized study of gauze impregnated in epinephrine versus aluminum chloride.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1583-1587
        • Silness J.
        • Loe H.
        Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 1964; 22: 121-135
        • Vy C.H.
        • Baumgartner J.C.
        • Marshall J.G.
        Cardiovascular effects and efficacy of a hemostatic agent in periradicular surgery.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 379-383
        • Vickers F.J.
        • Baumgartner J.C.
        • Marshall G.
        Hemostatic efficacy and cardiovascular effects of agents used during endodontic surgery.
        J Endod. 2002; 28: 322-323
        • von Arx T.
        • Kurt B.
        Root-end cavity preparation after apicoectomy using a new type of sonic and diamond-surfaced retrotip: a 1-year follow-up study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57: 656-661
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Buchner A.
        • Lang A.-G.
        Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
        Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41: 1149-1160