Advertisement
Clinical Research| Volume 45, ISSUE 4, P406-413, April 2019

The Impact of Different Diagnostic Imaging Modalities on the Evaluation of Root Canal Anatomy and Endodontic Residents' Stress Levels: A Clinical Study

Published:February 12, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.001

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The purpose of this study was firstly to compare the impact of radiographs, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging, and 3D Endo software (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) on the assessment of root canal anatomy and radiographic quality of endodontic treatment and secondly to assess stress levels in the same cohort of residents performing endodontic treatment.

      Methods

      Sixty patients requiring primary molar endodontic treatment were allocated randomly into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 20), conventional radiographs (periapical radiography [PR]) only; group 2 (n = 20), PR and CBCT imaging; and group 3 (n = 20), PR, CBCT imaging, and 3D Endo software. All treatment was performed using a standardized protocol. Residents completed a questionnaire to assess their stress levels and usefulness of the imaging modality used. The radiographic quality of completed cases was assessed by 2 experienced endodontists who were not involved in the supervision of the cases being assessed.

      Results

      Groups 2 (CBCT imaging) and 3 (PR, CBCT imaging, and 3D Endo) proved significantly better than group 1 (PR) (P < .001) for assessing the number of root canals and anatomy and estimating the working lengths. Group 3 provided a significantly more accurate determination of the working level (P = .002). There were significantly more cases with obturation short of the apex (<2 mm) and voids in group 1 compared with group 3 (P < .05) and a significantly higher number of cases with voids in group 1 compared with group 3 (P < .01). Clinicians found treatment to be moderately or very stressful in 75%, 5%, and 0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

      Conclusions

      3D Endo software followed by CBCT imaging were found to be more desirable for the evaluation of root canal anatomy and working lengths and reducing the residents' stress levels.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Furri M.
        Differences in the confluence of mesial canals in mandibular molar teeth with three or four root canals.
        Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 777-780
        • Gambarini G.
        • Ropini P.
        • Piasecki L.
        • et al.
        A preliminary assessment of a new dedicated endodontic software for use with CBCT images to evaluate the canal complexity of mandibular molars.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 259-268
        • Plotino G.
        • Grande N.M.
        • Melo M.C.
        • et al.
        Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature.
        Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 226-230
        • Shen Y.
        • Coil J.M.
        • Mo A.J.
        • et al.
        WaveOne Rotary Instruments after Clinical Use.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 186-189
        • Alfouzan K.
        • Jamleh A.
        Fracture of nickel titanium rotary instrument during root canal treatment and re-treatment: a 5-year retrospective study.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 157-163
        • European Society of Endodontology
        Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology.
        Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 921-930
        • Patel S.
        • Durack C.
        • Abella F.
        • et al.
        Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 3-15
        • Abella F.
        • Patel S.
        • Duran-Sindreu F.
        • et al.
        Mandibular first molars with disto-lingual roots: review and clinical management.
        Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 963-978
        • Bornstein M.M.
        • Lauber R.
        • Sendi P.
        • et al.
        Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 151-157
        • Brady E.
        • Mannocci F.
        • Brown J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth.
        Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 735-746
        • Cohenca N.
        • Silberman A.
        Contemporary imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic dental injuries: a review.
        Dent Traumatol. 2017; 33: 321-328
        • Patel S.
        • Foschi F.
        • Mannocci F.
        • et al.
        External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 206-214
        • Patel S.
        • Durack C.
        • Abella F.
        • et al.
        • European Society of Endodontology
        European Society of Endodontology position statement: the use of CBCT in endodontics.
        Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 502-504
      1. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 1393-1396
        • Blattner T.C.
        • George N.
        • Lee C.C.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 867-870
        • Ordinola-Zapata R.
        • Bramante C.M.
        • Versiani M.A.
        • et al.
        Comparative accuracy of the clearing technique, CBCT and Micro-CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars.
        Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 90-96
        • Estrela C.
        • Bueno M.R.
        • Sousa-Neto M.D.
        • et al.
        Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images.
        Braz Dent J. 2008; 19: 114-118
        • Baratto Filho F.
        • Zaitter S.
        • Haragushiku G.A.
        • et al.
        Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 337-342
        • Eriksen HM
        Epidemiology of apical periodontitis.
        in: Ørstavik D. TR P.F. Essential Endodontology: Prevention and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis. Blackwell Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark2008: 262-271
        • Kirkevang L.L.
        • Orstavik D.
        • Horsted-Bindslev P.
        • et al.
        Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population.
        Int Endod J. 2000; 33: 509-515
        • Ng Y.L.
        • Mann V.
        • Gulabivala K.
        A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health.
        Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 583-609
        • Azim A.A.
        • Griggs J.A.
        • Huang G.T.
        The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment.
        Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 6-16
        • Huumonen S.
        • Suominen A.L.
        • Vehkalahti M.M.
        Prevalence of apical periodontitis in root filled teeth: findings from a nationwide survey in Finland.
        Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 229-236
        • Setzer F.C.
        • Hinckley N.
        • Kohli M.R.
        • et al.
        A survey of cone-beam computed tomographic use among endodontic practitioners in the United States.
        J Endod. 2017; 43: 699-704
        • Tamse A.
        • Kaffe I.
        • Fishel D.
        Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980; 50: 563-566
        • Lambrianidis T.
        Observer variations in radiographic evaluation of endodontic therapy.
        Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985; 1: 235-241
        • Davies A.
        • Patel S.
        • Foschi F.
        • et al.
        The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up.
        Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 623-635
        • Eleftheriadis G.I.
        • Lambrianidis T.P.
        Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic.
        Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 725-734
        • Moradi S.
        • Gharechahi M.
        Radiographic quality of root canal treatment performed by 6(th) year undergraduate students in Mashhad, Iran.
        Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014; 11: 364-369
        • Ribeiro D.M.
        • Reus J.C.
        • Felippe W.T.
        • et al.
        Technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using hand instrumentation: a meta-analysis.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 269-283
        • Dahlstrom L.
        • Lindwall O.
        • Rystedt H.
        • et al.
        ‘Working in the dark': Swedish general dental practitioners on the complexity of root canal treatment.
        Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 636-645
        • Pauwels R.
        • Beinsberger J.
        • Collaert B.
        • et al.
        Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
        Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: 267-271
        • Loubele M.
        • Bogaerts R.
        • Van Dijck E.
        • et al.
        Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
        Eur J Radiol. 2009; 71: 461-468