Advertisement

Assessment of Perceptions of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Endodontic Treatment in a Military Population

  • Kristel Burgos
    Affiliations
    Department of Endodontics, US Army Dental Health Activity, Fort Gordon, Georgia

    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Postgraduate Dental College, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joseph M. Dutner
    Correspondence
    Address requests for reprints to Dr Joseph Dutner, US Army Dental Health Activity, Department of Endodontics, Tingay Dental Clinic, Building 320, East Hospital Road, Fort Gordon, GA 30905.
    Affiliations
    Department of Endodontics, US Army Dental Health Activity, Fort Gordon, Georgia

    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Postgraduate Dental College, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Matthew B. Phillips
    Affiliations
    Department of Endodontics, US Army Dental Health Activity, Fort Gordon, Georgia

    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Postgraduate Dental College, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
Published:April 23, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.020

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging has had a significant impact in endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Previous studies have investigated provider attitudes and the use of CBCT technology, but little is known about patients’ perceptions of the use of CBCT imaging in endodontics. This study assessed the perceptions of patients within a military population regarding the application of CBCT imaging for endodontic treatment.

      Methods

      One hundred three consecutive, volunteer patients who were treated in a military dental treatment facility and prescribed a CBCT study according to the American Association of Endodontists/American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology guidelines were given a Likert-type survey that recorded an initial level of knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of CBCT in endodontics. After standardized patient education in the form of a 2-minute video presentation describing the applications and risks associated with CBCT technology, CBCT volumes were acquired. A second survey was administered to record the patients’ perceptions of the benefits and risks associated with CBCT imaging.

      Results

      After the video, 75% of the participants had a more positive opinion of CBCT technology; 56% felt that CBCT imaging was essential, and 44% felt it was beneficial. Fifty percent of the participants reported CBCT imaging having less radiation than they previously thought, whereas 11% thought it was more radiation. A total of 85% would seek out a provider who uses CBCT imaging if treatment is needed in the future.

      Conclusions

      When presented with basic information, most patients within a military population perceive CBCT imaging to have an important role in endodontic treatment.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics
        AAE and AAOMR joint position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 120: 508-512
        • Patel S.
        • Durack C.
        • Abella F.
        • et al.
        Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 3-15
        • Sousa T.O.
        • Haiter-Neto F.
        • Nascimento E.H.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in identifying root canal configuration of human premolars.
        J Endod. 2017; 43: 1176-1179
        • de Paula-Silva F.W.
        • Wu M.K.
        • Leonardo M.R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1009-1012
        • Ee J.
        • Fayad M.I.
        • Johnson B.R.
        Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 910-916
        • Mota de Almeida F.J.
        • Knutsson K.
        • Flygare L.
        The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43 (20130137): 1-8
        • Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and Family Policy
        Profile of the Military Community: Demographics Report.
        Department of Defense, 2019 (Available at:)
        • Sweetman S.J.
        • Bernard J.
        Patient knowledge and perception of radiation risk in diagnostic imaging: a cross-sectional study.
        J Patient Exp. 2020; 7: 110-115
        • Ricketts M.L.
        • Baerlocher M.O.
        • Asch M.R.
        • Myers A.
        Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013; 64: 208-212
        • Hollada J.
        • Speier W.
        • Oshiro T.
        • et al.
        Patients' perceptions of radiation exposure associated with mammography.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 215-221
        • Lin Y.K.
        • Chen C.W.
        • Lee W.C.
        • et al.
        Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial.
        BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19: 23
      1. Types of bias in research: how to identify and prevent research bias. 2020 (Available at:) (Accessed June 15, 2020)