Clinical Research| Volume 47, ISSUE 10, P1575-1582, October 2021

Interexaminer Agreement in the Radiologic Identification of Apical Periodontitis/Rarefying Osteitis in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network PREDICT Endodontic Study



      Periapical images are routinely made in endodontics to support diagnosis and treatment decisions, but conventional imaging may not readily demonstrate inflammatory changes. This study aims to quantify disagreement in the radiologic interpretation of apical periodontitis/rarefying osteitis between 2 expert examiners and to determine if differences exist based on anatomic location.


      We used 1717 pretreatment periapical images made before orthograde endodontic treatment as part of the Predicting Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment (PREDICT) study conducted within the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Periapical changes were assessed independently by 2 board-certified specialists, an oral and maxillofacial radiologist and an endodontist, blinded to other clinical information. If the examiners disagreed about whether a diagnosis of apical periodontitis/rarefying osteitis was justified, an adjudication was made by a third examiner.


      The overall prevalence of this radiologic diagnosis in the periapical images was 55%, and interexaminer agreement measured with the Cohen kappa statistic was calculated to be 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.60). Diagnostic disagreements between the 2 examiners occurred for 377 teeth (22%), with disagreements more frequent for jaw location (P = .038) and tooth type (P = .021). Differences between root number (P = .058) and jaw location and tooth groups (P = .069) were found not to be statistically significant.


      The variability of diagnostic disagreements across anatomic location and tooth type may reflect the inability of periapical images to reveal bone changes masked by the complexity and density of overlying anatomic structures, a limitation that could potentially be overcome with the use of 3-dimensional imaging.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Baghdady M.T.
        • Pharoah M.J.
        • Regehr G.
        • et al.
        The role of basic sciences in diagnostic oral radiology.
        J Dent Educ. 2009; 73: 1187-1193
        • Bender I.B.
        • Seltzer S.
        Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1961; 62: 152-160
        • Bender I.B.
        Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bone lesions.
        J Endod. 1982; 8: 161-170
        • van der Stelt P.F.
        Experimentally produced bone lesions.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59: 306-312
        • Huumonen S.
        • Ørstavik D.
        Radiological aspects of apical periodontitis.
        Endod Topics. 2002; 1: 3-25
        • Patel S.
        • Dawood A.
        • Mannocci F.
        • et al.
        Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
        Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 507-515
        • Mortazavi1 H.
        • Baharvand M.
        Review of common conditions associated with periodontal ligament widening.
        Imaging Sci Dent. 2016; 46: 229-237
        • Lam E.W.
        Inflammatory conditions of the jaws.
        in: Mallya S.M. Lam E.W. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 8th ed. Elsevier, St Louis, MO2019: 364-386
        • Molven O.
        • Halse A.
        • Fristad I.
        Long-term reliability and observer comparisons in the radiographic diagnosis of periapical disease.
        Int J Endod. 2002; 35: 142-147
        • Halse A.
        • Molven O.
        • Fristad
        Diagnosing periapical lesions – disagreement and borderline cases.
        Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 703-709
      1. The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
        (Available at:) (Accessed August 9, 2021)
        • Cohen J.
        A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Shabahang S.
        Pulpal and periapical pathosis.
        in: Torabinejad M. Walton R.E. Fouad A.F. Endodontics: Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Elsevier, St Louis, MO2019: 59
        • Alsufyani N.A.
        • Lam E.W.
        Cemento-osseous dysplasia of the jaw bones: key radiographic features.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40: 141-146
        • Kaffe I.
        • Gratt B.M.
        Variations in the radiographic interpretation of the periapical dental region.
        J Endod. 1988; 14: 330-335
        • Uraba S.
        • Ebihara A.
        • Komatsu K.
        • et al.
        Ability of cone-beam computed tomography to detect periapical lesions that were not detected by periapical radiography: a retrospective assessment according to tooth group.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1186-1190
        • Low K.M.
        • Dula K.
        • Burgin W.
        • et al.
        Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 557-562
        • Cheung G.S.
        • Wei W.L.
        • McGrath C.
        Agreement between periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth.
        Int Endod J. 2013; 46: 889-895
        • Huumonen S.
        • Kvist T.
        • Grondahl K.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars.
        Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 827-833
        • Nair M.K.
        • Nair U.P.
        Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review.
        J Endod. 2007; 33: 1-6
        • Garcia de Paula-Silva F.W.
        • Wu M.-K.
        • Leonardo M.R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 1009-1012
        • Patel S.
        • Durack C.
        • Abella F.
        • et al.
        Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review.
        Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 3-15
        • Dutra K.L.
        • Haas L.
        • Porporatti A.L.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional radiography on apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 356-364
        • Kanagasingam S.
        • Lim C.X.
        • Yong C.P.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a reference standard.
        Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 417-426
      2. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 Update.
        Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol. 2015; 120: 508-512
        • SEDENTEXCT. Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172
        Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence Based guidelines.
        European Commission Directorate-General for Energy, Luxembourg2012