Advertisement

External Cervical Resorption: A Volumetric Analysis on Evolution of Defects over Time

Published:October 31, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.010

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The aim of this study was to assess the temporal evolution of external cervical resorption (ECR) defects using a volumetric quantification method.

      Methods

      Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images of patients diagnosed with ECR who chose not to receive treatment and attended recalls were collected. ECR defects were segmented in CBCT images at baseline and recall, and their volumes were quantified. The volumetric ratio of resorption defects/teeth was calculated. Three-dimensional classification of defects at baseline and recall and the prevalence of root surface perforations ≥1 mm were determined. The Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test, chi-square test, and linear regression models were used to analyze the data.

      Results

      Fifteen patients with 20 teeth diagnosed with ECR and an average recall time of 21 months were included. Nine (45%) teeth showed a change in 3-dimensional classification at recall. The volume of resorption defects (P = .0001) and the volumetric ratio of resorption defects/teeth (P = .0001) increased over time. The prevalence of root surface perforations ≥1 mm was higher at recall (n = 17, 85%) compared with baseline (n = 9, 45%) (P = .008). Linear regression models showed significant associations between the resorption defect volume at recall compared with baseline (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.053–0.081) and the volumetric ratio of resorption defects/teeth at recall compared with baseline (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.205-0.356). There was no association between the volume of resorption defects at recall with the length of the recall period, sex, or age (P > .05).

      Conclusions

      When left untreated, ECR defects can increase in size and develop more root surface perforations. ECR has a dynamic nature, and its volumetric increase over time does not result from uniform/linear expansion of the defects.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Patel S.
        • Mavridou A.M.
        • Lambrechts P.
        • Saberi N.
        External cervical resorption-part 1: histopathology, distribution and presentation.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 1205-1223
        • Heithersay G.
        Invasive cervical resorption following trauma.
        Aust Endod J. 1999; 25: 79-85
        • Mavridou A.M.
        • Hauben E.
        • Wevers M.
        • et al.
        Understanding external cervical resorption in vital teeth.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1737-1751
        • Patel S.
        • Saberi N.
        External cervical resorption associated with the use of bisphosphonates: a case series.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 742-748
        • Kumar V.
        • Chawla A.
        • Kaur A.
        Multiple idiopathic cervical root resorptions in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.
        J Endod. 2018; 44: 1575-1577
        • von Arx T.
        • Schawalder P.
        • Ackermann M.
        • Bosshardt D.D.
        Human and feline invasive cervical resorptions: the missing link?–presentation of four cases.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 904-913
        • Gunst V.
        • Huybrechts B.
        • De Almeida Neves A.
        • et al.
        Playing wind instruments as a potential aetiologic cofactor in external cervical resorption: two case reports.
        Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 268-282
        • Scarfe W.C.
        • Levin M.D.
        • Gane D.
        • Farman A.G.
        Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics.
        Int J Dent. 2009; 2009: 634567
        • Patel S.
        • Foschi F.
        • Mannocci F.
        • Patel K.
        External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 206-214
        • Rodríguez Mazón M.
        • Garcia-Font M.
        • Doria G.
        • et al.
        Influence of cone-beam computed tomography in clinical decision-making among different specialists in external cervical resorption lesions: a before-after study.
        J Endod. 2022; 48: 1121-1128
        • Matny L.E.
        • Ruparel N.B.
        • Levin M.D.
        • et al.
        A volumetric assessment of external cervical resorption cases and its correlation to classification, treatment planning, and expected prognosis.
        J Endod. 2020; 46: 1052-1058
        • Fedorov A.
        • Beichel R.
        • Kalpathy-Cramer J.
        • et al.
        3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30: 1323-1341
        • Rizzante F.A.P.
        • Sedky R.A.F.
        • Furuse A.Y.
        • et al.
        Validation of a method of quantifying 3D leakage in dental restorations.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 839-844
        • Heithersay G.
        Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic feature of invasive cervical resorption.
        Quintessence Int. 1999; 30: 27-37
        • Mavridou A.M.
        • Hauben E.
        • Wevers M.
        • et al.
        Understanding external cervical resorption patterns in endodontically treated teeth.
        Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 1116-1133
        • Thonen A.
        • Peltomaki T.
        • Patcas R.
        • Zehnder M.
        Occurrence of cervical invasive root resorption in first and second molar teeth of orthodontic patients eight years after bracket removal.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 27-30
        • Nosrat A.
        • Yu P.
        • Verma P.
        • et al.
        Was the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic associated with an increased rate of cracked teeth?.
        J Endod. 2022; 48: 1241-1247
        • Patel S.
        • Kanagasingam S.
        • Pitt Ford T.
        External cervical resorption: a review.
        J Endod. 2009; 35: 616-625
        • Patel S.
        • Foschi F.
        • Condon R.
        • et al.
        External cervical resorption: part 2–management.
        Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 1224-1238
        • Alghofaily M.
        • Torabinejad M.
        • Nosrat A.
        Regenerative endodontic treatment using periapical blood or circulating blood as scaffold: a volumetric analysis.
        J Endod. 2022; 48: 625-631
        • van der Borden W.G.
        • Wang X.
        • Wu M.K.
        • Shemesh H.
        Area and 3-dimensional volumetric changes of periapical lesions after root canal treatments.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 1245-1249
        • Irinakis E.
        • Haapasalo M.
        • Shen Y.
        • Aleksejuniene J.
        External cervical resorption–treatment outcomes and determinants: a retrospective cohort study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
        Int Endod J. 2022; 55: 441-452
        • Asgary S.
        • Nosrat A.
        Conservative management of class 4 invasive cervical root resorption using calcium-enriched mixture cement.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1291-1294
        • Asgary S.
        • Nourzadeh M.
        • Verma P.
        • et al.
        Vital pulp therapy as a conservative approach for management of invasive cervical root resorption: a case series.
        J Endod. 2019; 45: 1161-1167
        • Salzano S.
        • Tirone F.
        Conservative nonsurgical treatment of class 4 invasive cervical resorption: a case series.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 1907-1912
        • Shemesh A.
        • Ben Itzhak J.
        • Solomonov M.
        Minimally invasive treatment of class 4 invasive cervical resorption with internal approach: a case series.
        J Endod. 2017; 43: 1901-1908
        • Farzaneh M.
        • Abitbol S.
        • Friedman S.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: orthograde retreatment.
        J Endod. 2004; 30: 627-633
        • de Chevigny C.
        • Dao T.T.
        • Basrani B.R.
        • et al.
        Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 131-137
        • Mente J.
        • Leo M.
        • Panagidis D.
        • et al.
        Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate: repair of root perforations-long-term results.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 790-796
        • Asgary S.
        • Verma P.
        • Nosrat A.
        Periodontal healing following non-surgical repair of an old perforation with pocket formation and oral communication.
        Restor Dent Endod. 2018; 43: e17
        • Gorni F.G.
        • Andreano A.
        • Ambrogi F.
        • et al.
        Patient and clinical characteristics associated with primary healing of iatrogenic perforations after root canal treatment: results of a long-term Italian study.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 211-215
        • Gorni F.G.
        • Ionescu A.C.
        • Ambrogi F.
        • et al.
        Prognostic factors and primary healing on root perforation repaired with MTA: A 14-year longitudinal study.
        J Endod. 2022; 48: 1092-1099
        • Nosrat A.
        • Verma P.
        • Glass S.
        • et al.
        Non-hodgkin lymphoma mimicking endodontic lesion: a case report with 3-dimensional analysis, segmentation, and printing.
        J Endod. 2021; 47: 671-676