Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans are routinely used by endodontic residents and faculty at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine for diagnostic purposes but are not routinely read for pathologic findings by a radiologist. In a 2017 study by Oser et al (part 1), endodontic residents and a radiologist interpreted CBCT scans taken for endodontic diagnostic purposes, and their findings were compared. The results demonstrated that a radiologist is significantly more likely to report incidental findings in small field of view (FOV) scans. A limitation of this study was that the radiologist used a checklist of common findings to review the scans. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the use of a checklist would improve the sensitivity of the endodontic residents’ reporting of incidental findings in small FOV CBCT scans.
The 203 small FOV CBCT scans used in part 1 were obtained and reviewed by endodontic residents in a systematic fashion. Radiographic findings were reported using a blank checklist. The results were compared with those previously reported.
The radiologist reported abnormalities in 176 of the 203 subjects (87%), and the residents reported abnormalities in 184 of the 203 subjects (91%). There was an increase in false positive findings when the residents were using a checklist.
The use of a checklist improved the sensitivity but decreased the specificity of the reporting of incidental findings in small FOV CBCT scans by endodontic residents.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Endodontics
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- AAE and AAOMR joint position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 120: 508-512
- The frequency and nature of incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomographic scans of the head and neck region: a systematic review.J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144: 161-170
- Frequency and types of incidental findings on limited field of view CBCT scans.Gen Dent. 2021; 69: 42-45
- A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2019; 48: 20180396
- Incidental findings from a retrospective study of 318 cone beam computed tomography consultation reports.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 595-603
- Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 1261-1268
- Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography images.Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 871532
- Incidental findings in small field of view cone-beam computed tomography scans.J Endod. 2017; 43: 901-904
- Nature and clinical significance of incidental findings in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review.Oral Radiol. 2021; 37: 547-559
- Maxillary Sinusitis of Endodontic Origin: AAE Position Statement.Am Assoc Endod. 2018; (Available at:) (Accessed February 15, 2023)
Published online: January 23, 2023
© 2023 American Association of Endodontists.